Liberalism and multiculturalism: The politics of indifference
In modern societies, particularly the societies of the liberal democratic West, cultural diversity poses a challenge not only to the makers of government policy, but also to the philosopher looking to understand how it might be possible-in principle-for people of different ways to live together. The...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
1998
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2937 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4194/viewcontent/191768__1_.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-4194 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-41942019-09-02T05:17:49Z Liberalism and multiculturalism: The politics of indifference KUKATHAS, Chandran In modern societies, particularly the societies of the liberal democratic West, cultural diversity poses a challenge not only to the makers of government policy, but also to the philosopher looking to understand how it might be possible-in principle-for people of different ways to live together. The challenge is posed because society's institutions have been challenged, as the members of different groups have demanded "recognition." They have demanded not simply recognition of their claims to a (just) share of the social pie but, more important, recognition of their distinct identities as members of particular cultural communities within society. The persistence and, in some cases, the ferocity of demands for recognition have led many to concede that recognize them we must. The problem that arises for a liberal society, however, is that there quickly emerges a conflict between two demands: on one hand, that the dignity of the individual be recognized (by respecting certain fundamental rights); on the other hand, that the claims of the gr or cultural communities to which individuals belong be recognized. Philosophers such as Charles Taylor, who have viewed the problem in this way, also see that no simple solution to this conflict is available. A more complex, and nuanced, answer must therefore be given to the problem posed by the politics of recognition; and that answer must acknowledge the need for institutions that facilitate public deliberation and for attitudes of openness a 1998-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2937 info:doi/10.1177/0090591798026005003 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4194/viewcontent/191768__1_.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Comparative Politics Models and Methods |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Comparative Politics Models and Methods |
spellingShingle |
Comparative Politics Models and Methods KUKATHAS, Chandran Liberalism and multiculturalism: The politics of indifference |
description |
In modern societies, particularly the societies of the liberal democratic West, cultural diversity poses a challenge not only to the makers of government policy, but also to the philosopher looking to understand how it might be possible-in principle-for people of different ways to live together. The challenge is posed because society's institutions have been challenged, as the members of different groups have demanded "recognition." They have demanded not simply recognition of their claims to a (just) share of the social pie but, more important, recognition of their distinct identities as members of particular cultural communities within society. The persistence and, in some cases, the ferocity of demands for recognition have led many to concede that recognize them we must. The problem that arises for a liberal society, however, is that there quickly emerges a conflict between two demands: on one hand, that the dignity of the individual be recognized (by respecting certain fundamental rights); on the other hand, that the claims of the gr or cultural communities to which individuals belong be recognized. Philosophers such as Charles Taylor, who have viewed the problem in this way, also see that no simple solution to this conflict is available. A more complex, and nuanced, answer must therefore be given to the problem posed by the politics of recognition; and that answer must acknowledge the need for institutions that facilitate public deliberation and for attitudes of openness a |
format |
text |
author |
KUKATHAS, Chandran |
author_facet |
KUKATHAS, Chandran |
author_sort |
KUKATHAS, Chandran |
title |
Liberalism and multiculturalism: The politics of indifference |
title_short |
Liberalism and multiculturalism: The politics of indifference |
title_full |
Liberalism and multiculturalism: The politics of indifference |
title_fullStr |
Liberalism and multiculturalism: The politics of indifference |
title_full_unstemmed |
Liberalism and multiculturalism: The politics of indifference |
title_sort |
liberalism and multiculturalism: the politics of indifference |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
1998 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2937 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4194/viewcontent/191768__1_.pdf |
_version_ |
1770574789253005312 |