A crude bargain: Great powers, oil states, and petro-alignment

Petro-alignment, a quid pro quo arrangement whereby great powers offer security in exchange for oil states’ friendly oil policies, is a widely used and yet undertheorized energy security strategy. One consequential aspect of this exchange is that great powers choose different levels of security comm...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: KIM, Inwook
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2019
Subjects:
oil
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2963
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4220/viewcontent/101080_0963641220191662478.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-4220
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-42202021-11-16T06:32:28Z A crude bargain: Great powers, oil states, and petro-alignment KIM, Inwook Petro-alignment, a quid pro quo arrangement whereby great powers offer security in exchange for oil states’ friendly oil policies, is a widely used and yet undertheorized energy security strategy. One consequential aspect of this exchange is that great powers choose different levels of security commitment to keep oil producers friendly. With what criteria do great powers rank oil states? How do we conceptualize different types of petro-alignments? What exactly do great powers and oil producers exchange under each petro-alignment type? I posit that a mix of market power and geostrategic location determines the strategic value and vulnerability of individual client oil states, which then generates four corresponding types of petro-alignment—security guarantee, strategic alignment, strategic favor, and neglect. Two carefully selected case comparisons—Saudi Arabia and Kuwait in 1970–91, and Azerbaijan and Ecuador in 1990–2013—show how great powers created, utilized, and maintained petro-alignments under the unique logic of oil markets and across varying geopolitical settings. The findings have important implications on great powers’ grand strategies, strategic behaviors of oil states, and the role of oil in international security. 2019-09-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2963 info:doi/10.1080/09636412.2019.1662478 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4220/viewcontent/101080_0963641220191662478.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University oil petro-alignment oil market geopolitics asymmetric alliance grand strategy energy security Saudi Arabia US foreign policy Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Political Science
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic oil
petro-alignment
oil market
geopolitics
asymmetric alliance
grand strategy
energy security
Saudi Arabia
US foreign policy
Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law
Political Science
spellingShingle oil
petro-alignment
oil market
geopolitics
asymmetric alliance
grand strategy
energy security
Saudi Arabia
US foreign policy
Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law
Political Science
KIM, Inwook
A crude bargain: Great powers, oil states, and petro-alignment
description Petro-alignment, a quid pro quo arrangement whereby great powers offer security in exchange for oil states’ friendly oil policies, is a widely used and yet undertheorized energy security strategy. One consequential aspect of this exchange is that great powers choose different levels of security commitment to keep oil producers friendly. With what criteria do great powers rank oil states? How do we conceptualize different types of petro-alignments? What exactly do great powers and oil producers exchange under each petro-alignment type? I posit that a mix of market power and geostrategic location determines the strategic value and vulnerability of individual client oil states, which then generates four corresponding types of petro-alignment—security guarantee, strategic alignment, strategic favor, and neglect. Two carefully selected case comparisons—Saudi Arabia and Kuwait in 1970–91, and Azerbaijan and Ecuador in 1990–2013—show how great powers created, utilized, and maintained petro-alignments under the unique logic of oil markets and across varying geopolitical settings. The findings have important implications on great powers’ grand strategies, strategic behaviors of oil states, and the role of oil in international security.
format text
author KIM, Inwook
author_facet KIM, Inwook
author_sort KIM, Inwook
title A crude bargain: Great powers, oil states, and petro-alignment
title_short A crude bargain: Great powers, oil states, and petro-alignment
title_full A crude bargain: Great powers, oil states, and petro-alignment
title_fullStr A crude bargain: Great powers, oil states, and petro-alignment
title_full_unstemmed A crude bargain: Great powers, oil states, and petro-alignment
title_sort crude bargain: great powers, oil states, and petro-alignment
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2019
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2963
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4220/viewcontent/101080_0963641220191662478.pdf
_version_ 1770574805633859584