How ‘hot’ is too hot? Evaluating acceptable outdoor thermal comfort ranges in an equatorial urban park

Urban green spaces offer vital ecosystem services such as regulating elevated temperatures in cities. Less information exists, however, on how urban green spaces influence outdoor thermal comfort (OTC), which is dependent on people’s perceptions of the complex interactions amongst ambient humidity,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: HENG, Su Li, CHOW, Winston T. L.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3055
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4312/viewcontent/Heng_2019_How_hot_is_too_hot_evaluating_accep.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-4312
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-43122020-01-09T06:44:12Z How ‘hot’ is too hot? Evaluating acceptable outdoor thermal comfort ranges in an equatorial urban park HENG, Su Li CHOW, Winston T. L. Urban green spaces offer vital ecosystem services such as regulating elevated temperatures in cities. Less information exists, however, on how urban green spaces influence outdoor thermal comfort (OTC), which is dependent on people’s perceptions of the complex interactions amongst ambient humidity, wind and both air and radiant temperatures. In this study, we analysed an existing OTC dataset compiled within a large Singapore urban park and calibrated OTC thresholds for physiological equivalent temperatures (PET) by analysing PET against thermal perception survey responses from the park visitors (n = 1508). We examined OTC according to (i) neutral, (ii) acceptable and (iii) preferred temperatures, where respondents felt ‘comfortable’ outdoors in the park. We estimated that neutral temperature, when all respondents experience neither heat nor cold stress, is 26.2 °C; acceptable temperatures, when only slight heat or cold stress is experienced, range between 21.6 and 31.6 °C; and preferred (‘ideal’) temperature for all respondents is 24.2 °C. Respondents residing for more than 6 months in Singapore achieved thermal neutrality, suggesting that a greater degree of thermal adaptation likely developed during acclimatisation to local climate through a combination of physiological, behavioural and psychological circumstances. Comparisons with other OTC studies showed differences in synoptic climates are linked to variations in the magnitude and ranges of perceived PET. Lastly, respondents in this study perceived lower neutral and preferred temperatures compared to respondents surveyed over a variety of urban land use categories in another local study. The differences in neutral and preferred temperatures between studies suggest that lower park temperatures and different environmental attitudes influence perceived OTC. 2019-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3055 info:doi/10.1007/s00484-019-01694-1 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4312/viewcontent/Heng_2019_How_hot_is_too_hot_evaluating_accep.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Physiological equivalent temperature Outdoor thermal comfort Urban greenery Acclimatisation Environmental Sciences
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Physiological equivalent temperature
Outdoor thermal comfort
Urban greenery
Acclimatisation
Environmental Sciences
spellingShingle Physiological equivalent temperature
Outdoor thermal comfort
Urban greenery
Acclimatisation
Environmental Sciences
HENG, Su Li
CHOW, Winston T. L.
How ‘hot’ is too hot? Evaluating acceptable outdoor thermal comfort ranges in an equatorial urban park
description Urban green spaces offer vital ecosystem services such as regulating elevated temperatures in cities. Less information exists, however, on how urban green spaces influence outdoor thermal comfort (OTC), which is dependent on people’s perceptions of the complex interactions amongst ambient humidity, wind and both air and radiant temperatures. In this study, we analysed an existing OTC dataset compiled within a large Singapore urban park and calibrated OTC thresholds for physiological equivalent temperatures (PET) by analysing PET against thermal perception survey responses from the park visitors (n = 1508). We examined OTC according to (i) neutral, (ii) acceptable and (iii) preferred temperatures, where respondents felt ‘comfortable’ outdoors in the park. We estimated that neutral temperature, when all respondents experience neither heat nor cold stress, is 26.2 °C; acceptable temperatures, when only slight heat or cold stress is experienced, range between 21.6 and 31.6 °C; and preferred (‘ideal’) temperature for all respondents is 24.2 °C. Respondents residing for more than 6 months in Singapore achieved thermal neutrality, suggesting that a greater degree of thermal adaptation likely developed during acclimatisation to local climate through a combination of physiological, behavioural and psychological circumstances. Comparisons with other OTC studies showed differences in synoptic climates are linked to variations in the magnitude and ranges of perceived PET. Lastly, respondents in this study perceived lower neutral and preferred temperatures compared to respondents surveyed over a variety of urban land use categories in another local study. The differences in neutral and preferred temperatures between studies suggest that lower park temperatures and different environmental attitudes influence perceived OTC.
format text
author HENG, Su Li
CHOW, Winston T. L.
author_facet HENG, Su Li
CHOW, Winston T. L.
author_sort HENG, Su Li
title How ‘hot’ is too hot? Evaluating acceptable outdoor thermal comfort ranges in an equatorial urban park
title_short How ‘hot’ is too hot? Evaluating acceptable outdoor thermal comfort ranges in an equatorial urban park
title_full How ‘hot’ is too hot? Evaluating acceptable outdoor thermal comfort ranges in an equatorial urban park
title_fullStr How ‘hot’ is too hot? Evaluating acceptable outdoor thermal comfort ranges in an equatorial urban park
title_full_unstemmed How ‘hot’ is too hot? Evaluating acceptable outdoor thermal comfort ranges in an equatorial urban park
title_sort how ‘hot’ is too hot? evaluating acceptable outdoor thermal comfort ranges in an equatorial urban park
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2019
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3055
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4312/viewcontent/Heng_2019_How_hot_is_too_hot_evaluating_accep.pdf
_version_ 1770575001127223296