Political financing reform: Politics, policies, and patronage in Malaysia

This article analyses the evolution of political finance reform debates in Malaysia, one of the world’s most durable electoral authoritarian regimes. While the reliance of the dominant party, UMNO, on unfettered resources remained unchanged, crises in Malaysia’s political environment allowed civil s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: DETTMAN, Sebastian Carl, GOMEZ, Edmund Terence
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3122
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4379/viewcontent/Political_Financing_Reform_av.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-4379
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-43792020-02-13T09:18:46Z Political financing reform: Politics, policies, and patronage in Malaysia DETTMAN, Sebastian Carl GOMEZ, Edmund Terence This article analyses the evolution of political finance reform debates in Malaysia, one of the world’s most durable electoral authoritarian regimes. While the reliance of the dominant party, UMNO, on unfettered resources remained unchanged, crises in Malaysia’s political environment allowed civil society actors to concretise abstract debates over reform into specific proposals. Drawing from interviews, public statements and observation, two distinct periods in this reform debate are analysed: after Najib Razak assumed power in 2009, following the unprecedented electoral success of the opposition during the 2008 general election; and after the 1MDB scandal broke in 2015. In both periods, civil society actors took advantage of new political dynamics to present specific proposals for political finance reform. These proposals laid the groundwork for government-led reform recommendations, though key provisions were excised that would curb UMNO’s power. Reform efforts stalled when the government resisted deeper reform while opposition parties offered little support for the proposed changes. This article reviews an under-researched area of policy interactions in electoral authoritarian regimes involving not just the ruling party and the opposition, but also civil society. A postscript considers the trajectory of this debate following the 2018 national elections which toppled UMNO from power. 2020-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3122 info:doi/10.1080/00472336.2019.1571218 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4379/viewcontent/Political_Financing_Reform_av.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Political financing reforms electoral authoritarian regimes policies patronage Malaysia Asian Studies Political Science
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Political financing reforms
electoral authoritarian regimes
policies
patronage
Malaysia
Asian Studies
Political Science
spellingShingle Political financing reforms
electoral authoritarian regimes
policies
patronage
Malaysia
Asian Studies
Political Science
DETTMAN, Sebastian Carl
GOMEZ, Edmund Terence
Political financing reform: Politics, policies, and patronage in Malaysia
description This article analyses the evolution of political finance reform debates in Malaysia, one of the world’s most durable electoral authoritarian regimes. While the reliance of the dominant party, UMNO, on unfettered resources remained unchanged, crises in Malaysia’s political environment allowed civil society actors to concretise abstract debates over reform into specific proposals. Drawing from interviews, public statements and observation, two distinct periods in this reform debate are analysed: after Najib Razak assumed power in 2009, following the unprecedented electoral success of the opposition during the 2008 general election; and after the 1MDB scandal broke in 2015. In both periods, civil society actors took advantage of new political dynamics to present specific proposals for political finance reform. These proposals laid the groundwork for government-led reform recommendations, though key provisions were excised that would curb UMNO’s power. Reform efforts stalled when the government resisted deeper reform while opposition parties offered little support for the proposed changes. This article reviews an under-researched area of policy interactions in electoral authoritarian regimes involving not just the ruling party and the opposition, but also civil society. A postscript considers the trajectory of this debate following the 2018 national elections which toppled UMNO from power.
format text
author DETTMAN, Sebastian Carl
GOMEZ, Edmund Terence
author_facet DETTMAN, Sebastian Carl
GOMEZ, Edmund Terence
author_sort DETTMAN, Sebastian Carl
title Political financing reform: Politics, policies, and patronage in Malaysia
title_short Political financing reform: Politics, policies, and patronage in Malaysia
title_full Political financing reform: Politics, policies, and patronage in Malaysia
title_fullStr Political financing reform: Politics, policies, and patronage in Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Political financing reform: Politics, policies, and patronage in Malaysia
title_sort political financing reform: politics, policies, and patronage in malaysia
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2020
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3122
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4379/viewcontent/Political_Financing_Reform_av.pdf
_version_ 1770575129514868736