Relativized rankings
In traditional consequentialism the good is position-neutral. A single evaluative ranking of states of affairs is correct for everyone, everywhere regardless of their positions. Recently, position-relative forms of consequentialism have been developed. These allow for the correct rankings of states...
Saved in:
Main Author: | HAMMERTON, Matthew |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3253 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4510/viewcontent/Relativized_Rankings.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Non-compliance shouldn't be better
by: Forcehimes, Andrew T., et al.
Published: (2019) -
Patient-relativity in morality
by: HAMMERTON, Matthew
Published: (2016) -
Deontic constraints are maximizing rules
by: HAMMERTON, Matthew
Published: (2020) -
Agent-relative consequentialism and collective self-defeat
by: HAMMERTON, Matthew
Published: (2020) -
Is agent-neutral deontology possible?
by: HAMMERTON, Matthew
Published: (2017)