Who doesn’t want democracy? A multilevel analysis of elite and mass attitudes
Despite its global rise in popularity, a significant number of people still oppose democracy. The present study evaluates three competing theories of opposition to democracy—developmentalist, culturalist, and elitist—using a series of multilevel regression models that combine individual- and country...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3303 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4554/viewcontent/0731121418785626.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-4554 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-45542021-04-30T03:39:00Z Who doesn’t want democracy? A multilevel analysis of elite and mass attitudes GORMAN, Brandon NAQVI, Ijlal KURZMAN, Charles Despite its global rise in popularity, a significant number of people still oppose democracy. The present study evaluates three competing theories of opposition to democracy—developmentalist, culturalist, and elitist—using a series of multilevel regression models that combine individual- and country-level variables. Results of our statistical analyses suggest that (1) country-level indicators of social, political, and economic development are unrelated to individual support for democracy; (2) macro-cultural factors have mixed effects on individual support for democracy; and (3) individual income and education have strong effects on individual support for democracy, but this relationship is mediated by country-level economic development. Specifically, we find that, in relatively underdeveloped countries, high-income individuals are more likely to oppose democracy than low-income individuals. These results suggest that economic, social, and political development do not necessarily go together, most strongly supporting elitist approaches to studying opposition to democracy. 2018-07-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3303 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4554/viewcontent/0731121418785626.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Development Democracy Political attitudes Elites Multilevel modeling Political Science |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Development Democracy Political attitudes Elites Multilevel modeling Political Science |
spellingShingle |
Development Democracy Political attitudes Elites Multilevel modeling Political Science GORMAN, Brandon NAQVI, Ijlal KURZMAN, Charles Who doesn’t want democracy? A multilevel analysis of elite and mass attitudes |
description |
Despite its global rise in popularity, a significant number of people still oppose democracy. The present study evaluates three competing theories of opposition to democracy—developmentalist, culturalist, and elitist—using a series of multilevel regression models that combine individual- and country-level variables. Results of our statistical analyses suggest that (1) country-level indicators of social, political, and economic development are unrelated to individual support for democracy; (2) macro-cultural factors have mixed effects on individual support for democracy; and (3) individual income and education have strong effects on individual support for democracy, but this relationship is mediated by country-level economic development. Specifically, we find that, in relatively underdeveloped countries, high-income individuals are more likely to oppose democracy than low-income individuals. These results suggest that economic, social, and political development do not necessarily go together, most strongly supporting elitist approaches to studying opposition to democracy. |
format |
text |
author |
GORMAN, Brandon NAQVI, Ijlal KURZMAN, Charles |
author_facet |
GORMAN, Brandon NAQVI, Ijlal KURZMAN, Charles |
author_sort |
GORMAN, Brandon |
title |
Who doesn’t want democracy? A multilevel analysis of elite and mass attitudes |
title_short |
Who doesn’t want democracy? A multilevel analysis of elite and mass attitudes |
title_full |
Who doesn’t want democracy? A multilevel analysis of elite and mass attitudes |
title_fullStr |
Who doesn’t want democracy? A multilevel analysis of elite and mass attitudes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Who doesn’t want democracy? A multilevel analysis of elite and mass attitudes |
title_sort |
who doesn’t want democracy? a multilevel analysis of elite and mass attitudes |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3303 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4554/viewcontent/0731121418785626.pdf |
_version_ |
1770575684122443776 |