Barking without biting: Understanding Chinese media campaigns during foreign policy disputes
What motivates Chinese media campaigns during foreign policy disputes and how are they carried out? “Influence campaigns” are often recognized as highly pertinent to international security, yet they remain understudied. This paper develops and tests a theory that explains these media campaigns as st...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3349 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4606/viewcontent/Barking_WO_Biting_Accepted_v20210504_SSRN.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-4606 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-46062021-10-27T07:29:28Z Barking without biting: Understanding Chinese media campaigns during foreign policy disputes WANG, Frances Yaping What motivates Chinese media campaigns during foreign policy disputes and how are they carried out? “Influence campaigns” are often recognized as highly pertinent to international security, yet they remain understudied. This paper develops and tests a theory that explains these media campaigns as strategic actions to align domestic public opinion when it deviates from the state’s preferred foreign policy, exploiting the media’s mobilization or pacification effect. These divergent media effects correspond to two types of media campaigns respectively – the mobilization campaigns and the pacification campaigns. The pacification campaigns are particularly important because they indicate that hawkish rhetoric may counterintuitively pacify the public, and hence its adoption implies a moderate foreign policy intent. A medium-n congruence test of 21 Chinese diplomatic crises and process-tracing of the 2016 Sino-Philippines arbitration case offer strong support for the theory and demonstrate how a pacification campaign works and how it differs from a mobilization campaign. 2021-10-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3349 info:doi/10.6084/m9.figshare.14459172 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4606/viewcontent/Barking_WO_Biting_Accepted_v20210504_SSRN.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University media campaigns authoritarian politics interstate disputes Asian Studies International Relations |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
media campaigns authoritarian politics interstate disputes Asian Studies International Relations |
spellingShingle |
media campaigns authoritarian politics interstate disputes Asian Studies International Relations WANG, Frances Yaping Barking without biting: Understanding Chinese media campaigns during foreign policy disputes |
description |
What motivates Chinese media campaigns during foreign policy disputes and how are they carried out? “Influence campaigns” are often recognized as highly pertinent to international security, yet they remain understudied. This paper develops and tests a theory that explains these media campaigns as strategic actions to align domestic public opinion when it deviates from the state’s preferred foreign policy, exploiting the media’s mobilization or pacification effect. These divergent media effects correspond to two types of media campaigns respectively – the mobilization campaigns and the pacification campaigns. The pacification campaigns are particularly important because they indicate that hawkish rhetoric may counterintuitively pacify the public, and hence its adoption implies a moderate foreign policy intent. A medium-n congruence test of 21 Chinese diplomatic crises and process-tracing of the 2016 Sino-Philippines arbitration case offer strong support for the theory and demonstrate how a pacification campaign works and how it differs from a mobilization campaign. |
format |
text |
author |
WANG, Frances Yaping |
author_facet |
WANG, Frances Yaping |
author_sort |
WANG, Frances Yaping |
title |
Barking without biting: Understanding Chinese media campaigns during foreign policy disputes |
title_short |
Barking without biting: Understanding Chinese media campaigns during foreign policy disputes |
title_full |
Barking without biting: Understanding Chinese media campaigns during foreign policy disputes |
title_fullStr |
Barking without biting: Understanding Chinese media campaigns during foreign policy disputes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Barking without biting: Understanding Chinese media campaigns during foreign policy disputes |
title_sort |
barking without biting: understanding chinese media campaigns during foreign policy disputes |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3349 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4606/viewcontent/Barking_WO_Biting_Accepted_v20210504_SSRN.pdf |
_version_ |
1770575875382706176 |