Deprovincializing racial capitalism: John Crawfurd and settler colonialism in India

Recent literature on racial capitalism has overwhelmingly focused on the Atlantic settler-slave formation, sidelining the history of European imperialism in Asia. This article addresses this blind spot by recovering the aborted project of British settler colonialism in India through the writings of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: INCE, Onur Ulas
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3438
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4695/viewcontent/Ince_2021_Deprovincializing_Racial_Capitalism.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-4695
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-46952024-03-04T07:45:05Z Deprovincializing racial capitalism: John Crawfurd and settler colonialism in India INCE, Onur Ulas Recent literature on racial capitalism has overwhelmingly focused on the Atlantic settler-slave formation, sidelining the history of European imperialism in Asia. This article addresses this blind spot by recovering the aborted project of British settler colonialism in India through the writings of its most prominent advocate, John Crawfurd. It is argued that Crawfurd’s vision of a liberal empire in India rejected slavery and indigenous dispossession yet remained deeply racialized in its conception of capital, labor, and value. Crawfurd elaborated a “capital theory of race,” which derived racial categories from a civilizational spectrum keyed to the capitalist organization of production. His proposals accordingly revamped the conventional terms of colonization by representing India as overstocked with labor but vacant of capital and skill that only European settlers could provide. The article concludes with the broader implications of a trans-imperial analytic framework for writing connected histories of racial capitalism and settler colonialism. 2022-02-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3438 info:doi/10.1017/S0003055421000939 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4695/viewcontent/Ince_2021_Deprovincializing_Racial_Capitalism.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University racial capitalism settler colonialism British empire liberalism India John Crawfurd Asian Studies Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic racial capitalism
settler colonialism
British empire
liberalism
India
John Crawfurd
Asian Studies
Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies
spellingShingle racial capitalism
settler colonialism
British empire
liberalism
India
John Crawfurd
Asian Studies
Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies
INCE, Onur Ulas
Deprovincializing racial capitalism: John Crawfurd and settler colonialism in India
description Recent literature on racial capitalism has overwhelmingly focused on the Atlantic settler-slave formation, sidelining the history of European imperialism in Asia. This article addresses this blind spot by recovering the aborted project of British settler colonialism in India through the writings of its most prominent advocate, John Crawfurd. It is argued that Crawfurd’s vision of a liberal empire in India rejected slavery and indigenous dispossession yet remained deeply racialized in its conception of capital, labor, and value. Crawfurd elaborated a “capital theory of race,” which derived racial categories from a civilizational spectrum keyed to the capitalist organization of production. His proposals accordingly revamped the conventional terms of colonization by representing India as overstocked with labor but vacant of capital and skill that only European settlers could provide. The article concludes with the broader implications of a trans-imperial analytic framework for writing connected histories of racial capitalism and settler colonialism.
format text
author INCE, Onur Ulas
author_facet INCE, Onur Ulas
author_sort INCE, Onur Ulas
title Deprovincializing racial capitalism: John Crawfurd and settler colonialism in India
title_short Deprovincializing racial capitalism: John Crawfurd and settler colonialism in India
title_full Deprovincializing racial capitalism: John Crawfurd and settler colonialism in India
title_fullStr Deprovincializing racial capitalism: John Crawfurd and settler colonialism in India
title_full_unstemmed Deprovincializing racial capitalism: John Crawfurd and settler colonialism in India
title_sort deprovincializing racial capitalism: john crawfurd and settler colonialism in india
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2022
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3438
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4695/viewcontent/Ince_2021_Deprovincializing_Racial_Capitalism.pdf
_version_ 1794549753644580864