Rethinking the procedural in policy instrument ‘compounds’: A renewable energy policy perspective

Contemporary research in the policy sciences places effectiveness as the central goal of policy design. This emphasis permeates both micro-level design considerations for specific policy calibrations, as well as more meso-level policy tool and tool mixes. Effective instrument design, therefore, augm...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: MUKHERJEE, Ishani
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3498
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4756/viewcontent/14494035.2021.1955488_pvoa_cc_by.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-4756
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-47562023-11-23T05:21:12Z Rethinking the procedural in policy instrument ‘compounds’: A renewable energy policy perspective MUKHERJEE, Ishani Contemporary research in the policy sciences places effectiveness as the central goal of policy design. This emphasis permeates both micro-level design considerations for specific policy calibrations, as well as more meso-level policy tool and tool mixes. Effective instrument design, therefore, augments the task of looking at individual tools to considering them as tool ‘compounds’, that comprise of substantive and procedural means interacting through the process of designing tools and subsequent tool calibrations. The academic study of policy tools thus far has proffered several perspectives on how they can individually be distinguished by their different substantive components and categorized based on common governance resources that need to be mobilized to create them. However, it is eventually how well policy tools are able to coordinate the support of common procedural means and how well they are able to align their enactment plans, which determine how effectively they work together as a deliberate toolkit. In line with the growing literature on policy design and multi-component policy means, this paper magnifies policy instrument design as a complex of procedural and substantive means. To illustrate the notion of such design compounds, this paper synopsizes the state of knowledge on the formulation of three classes of energy policies as an illustration of how substantive and procedural components interact during policy instrument design. 2021-07-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3498 info:doi/10.1080/14494035.2021.1955488 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4756/viewcontent/14494035.2021.1955488_pvoa_cc_by.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University policy instruments procedural tools policy tools policy design renewable energy Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic policy instruments
procedural tools
policy tools
policy design
renewable energy
Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation
spellingShingle policy instruments
procedural tools
policy tools
policy design
renewable energy
Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation
MUKHERJEE, Ishani
Rethinking the procedural in policy instrument ‘compounds’: A renewable energy policy perspective
description Contemporary research in the policy sciences places effectiveness as the central goal of policy design. This emphasis permeates both micro-level design considerations for specific policy calibrations, as well as more meso-level policy tool and tool mixes. Effective instrument design, therefore, augments the task of looking at individual tools to considering them as tool ‘compounds’, that comprise of substantive and procedural means interacting through the process of designing tools and subsequent tool calibrations. The academic study of policy tools thus far has proffered several perspectives on how they can individually be distinguished by their different substantive components and categorized based on common governance resources that need to be mobilized to create them. However, it is eventually how well policy tools are able to coordinate the support of common procedural means and how well they are able to align their enactment plans, which determine how effectively they work together as a deliberate toolkit. In line with the growing literature on policy design and multi-component policy means, this paper magnifies policy instrument design as a complex of procedural and substantive means. To illustrate the notion of such design compounds, this paper synopsizes the state of knowledge on the formulation of three classes of energy policies as an illustration of how substantive and procedural components interact during policy instrument design.
format text
author MUKHERJEE, Ishani
author_facet MUKHERJEE, Ishani
author_sort MUKHERJEE, Ishani
title Rethinking the procedural in policy instrument ‘compounds’: A renewable energy policy perspective
title_short Rethinking the procedural in policy instrument ‘compounds’: A renewable energy policy perspective
title_full Rethinking the procedural in policy instrument ‘compounds’: A renewable energy policy perspective
title_fullStr Rethinking the procedural in policy instrument ‘compounds’: A renewable energy policy perspective
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking the procedural in policy instrument ‘compounds’: A renewable energy policy perspective
title_sort rethinking the procedural in policy instrument ‘compounds’: a renewable energy policy perspective
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2021
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3498
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4756/viewcontent/14494035.2021.1955488_pvoa_cc_by.pdf
_version_ 1783955691652775936