Dimensions of social networks: A taxonomy and operationalization

What are the basic types of social network ties captured by name generators? While there have been several classifications proposed, and a large proliferation of name generators capturing various tie content has emerged, there is no clear way to map a given name generator to a particular tie type. B...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: GENKIN, Michael, HARRIGAN, Nicholas, KANAGAVEL, Rajalakshmi, YAP, Janice
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3535
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4793/viewcontent/Taxonomy_of_Ties.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-4793
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-47932022-06-28T01:50:39Z Dimensions of social networks: A taxonomy and operationalization GENKIN, Michael HARRIGAN, Nicholas KANAGAVEL, Rajalakshmi YAP, Janice What are the basic types of social network ties captured by name generators? While there have been several classifications proposed, and a large proliferation of name generators capturing various tie content has emerged, there is no clear way to map a given name generator to a particular tie type. Building on previous research, this paper proposes a framework for doing so in a principled way based on two studies. Study 1 is a dimension reduction of 24 common name generators. We find two dimensions (Valence and Social Distance), three positive tie types (Admiration, Closeness, Socialize), and three negative tie types (Active Conflict, Passive Conflict, Contempt) and use Youden's J statistic as a metric to identify the name generator that best maximizes sensitivity and specificity for detecting our tie types. We find that the most common name generators used by researchers fall within just one tie type (closeness). Study 2 models these six tie types as predictors and outcomes of important sociological variables and finds that each tie type is associated with distinct patterns of emotions, social support, social status, and social roles. Our taxonomy makes a contribution to network theory as well as study design. In particular, it advances our understanding of the nature of signed ties. We find that negative ties are both bipolar and orthogonal, and distinguish between two types of ambivalence. Moreover, the findings contribute to the further refinement and elaboration of a comprehensive taxonomy of network ties. 2022-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3535 info:doi/10.1016/j.socnet.2022.02.005 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4793/viewcontent/Taxonomy_of_Ties.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Name Generators Taxonomy Tie Types Multiplex Ties Dimension Reduction Social and Behavioral Sciences Sociology
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Name Generators
Taxonomy
Tie Types
Multiplex Ties
Dimension Reduction
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Sociology
spellingShingle Name Generators
Taxonomy
Tie Types
Multiplex Ties
Dimension Reduction
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Sociology
GENKIN, Michael
HARRIGAN, Nicholas
KANAGAVEL, Rajalakshmi
YAP, Janice
Dimensions of social networks: A taxonomy and operationalization
description What are the basic types of social network ties captured by name generators? While there have been several classifications proposed, and a large proliferation of name generators capturing various tie content has emerged, there is no clear way to map a given name generator to a particular tie type. Building on previous research, this paper proposes a framework for doing so in a principled way based on two studies. Study 1 is a dimension reduction of 24 common name generators. We find two dimensions (Valence and Social Distance), three positive tie types (Admiration, Closeness, Socialize), and three negative tie types (Active Conflict, Passive Conflict, Contempt) and use Youden's J statistic as a metric to identify the name generator that best maximizes sensitivity and specificity for detecting our tie types. We find that the most common name generators used by researchers fall within just one tie type (closeness). Study 2 models these six tie types as predictors and outcomes of important sociological variables and finds that each tie type is associated with distinct patterns of emotions, social support, social status, and social roles. Our taxonomy makes a contribution to network theory as well as study design. In particular, it advances our understanding of the nature of signed ties. We find that negative ties are both bipolar and orthogonal, and distinguish between two types of ambivalence. Moreover, the findings contribute to the further refinement and elaboration of a comprehensive taxonomy of network ties.
format text
author GENKIN, Michael
HARRIGAN, Nicholas
KANAGAVEL, Rajalakshmi
YAP, Janice
author_facet GENKIN, Michael
HARRIGAN, Nicholas
KANAGAVEL, Rajalakshmi
YAP, Janice
author_sort GENKIN, Michael
title Dimensions of social networks: A taxonomy and operationalization
title_short Dimensions of social networks: A taxonomy and operationalization
title_full Dimensions of social networks: A taxonomy and operationalization
title_fullStr Dimensions of social networks: A taxonomy and operationalization
title_full_unstemmed Dimensions of social networks: A taxonomy and operationalization
title_sort dimensions of social networks: a taxonomy and operationalization
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2022
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3535
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4793/viewcontent/Taxonomy_of_Ties.pdf
_version_ 1770576142402584576