Russian logics and the culture of impossible: Part II: Reinterpreting algorithmic rationality
This article reinterprets algorithmic rationality by looking at the interaction between mathematical logic, mechanized reasoning, and, later, computing in the Russian Imperial and Soviet contexts to offer a history of the algorithm as a mathematical object bridging the inner and outer worlds, a huma...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3544 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4802/viewcontent/PART2Russian_Logics_and_the_Cybernetics_of_Impossible_sv.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-4802 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-48022023-09-08T04:36:20Z Russian logics and the culture of impossible: Part II: Reinterpreting algorithmic rationality TATARCHENKO, Ksenia Yermakova, Anya De Mol, Liesbeth This article reinterprets algorithmic rationality by looking at the interaction between mathematical logic, mechanized reasoning, and, later, computing in the Russian Imperial and Soviet contexts to offer a history of the algorithm as a mathematical object bridging the inner and outer worlds, a humanistic vision that we, following logician Vladimir Uspensky, call the “culture of the impossible.” We unfold the deep roots of this vision as embodied in scientific intelligentsia. In Part I, we examine continuities between the turn-of-the-twentieth-century discussions of poznaniye—an epistemic orientation towards the process of knowledge acquisition—and the postwar rise of the Soviet school of mathematical logic. Establishing this connection allows us to explain, in Part II, the role of the algorithm in disciplinary dynamics between mathematical logic and cybernetics and a characteristic understanding of programming, not as a narrow skill, but as a matter of consciousness. 2022-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3544 info:doi/10.1109/MAHC.2021.3135714 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4802/viewcontent/PART2Russian_Logics_and_the_Cybernetics_of_Impossible_sv.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University algorithm logic cybernetics Soviet Union Cold War Vladimir Uspensky Logic and Foundations of Mathematics Philosophy of Science |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
algorithm logic cybernetics Soviet Union Cold War Vladimir Uspensky Logic and Foundations of Mathematics Philosophy of Science |
spellingShingle |
algorithm logic cybernetics Soviet Union Cold War Vladimir Uspensky Logic and Foundations of Mathematics Philosophy of Science TATARCHENKO, Ksenia Yermakova, Anya De Mol, Liesbeth Russian logics and the culture of impossible: Part II: Reinterpreting algorithmic rationality |
description |
This article reinterprets algorithmic rationality by looking at the interaction between mathematical logic, mechanized reasoning, and, later, computing in the Russian Imperial and Soviet contexts to offer a history of the algorithm as a mathematical object bridging the inner and outer worlds, a humanistic vision that we, following logician Vladimir Uspensky, call the “culture of the impossible.” We unfold the deep roots of this vision as embodied in scientific intelligentsia. In Part I, we examine continuities between the turn-of-the-twentieth-century discussions of poznaniye—an epistemic orientation towards the process of knowledge acquisition—and the postwar rise of the Soviet school of mathematical logic. Establishing this connection allows us to explain, in Part II, the role of the algorithm in disciplinary dynamics between mathematical logic and cybernetics and a characteristic understanding of programming, not as a narrow skill, but as a matter of consciousness. |
format |
text |
author |
TATARCHENKO, Ksenia Yermakova, Anya De Mol, Liesbeth |
author_facet |
TATARCHENKO, Ksenia Yermakova, Anya De Mol, Liesbeth |
author_sort |
TATARCHENKO, Ksenia |
title |
Russian logics and the culture of impossible: Part II: Reinterpreting algorithmic rationality |
title_short |
Russian logics and the culture of impossible: Part II: Reinterpreting algorithmic rationality |
title_full |
Russian logics and the culture of impossible: Part II: Reinterpreting algorithmic rationality |
title_fullStr |
Russian logics and the culture of impossible: Part II: Reinterpreting algorithmic rationality |
title_full_unstemmed |
Russian logics and the culture of impossible: Part II: Reinterpreting algorithmic rationality |
title_sort |
russian logics and the culture of impossible: part ii: reinterpreting algorithmic rationality |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3544 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4802/viewcontent/PART2Russian_Logics_and_the_Cybernetics_of_Impossible_sv.pdf |
_version_ |
1779157166399160320 |