The fundamental divisions in ethics

What are the fundamental divisions in ethics? Which divisions capture the most important and basic options in moral theorizing? In this article, I reject the ‘Textbook View’ which takes the tripartite division between consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics to be fundamental. Instead, I sugg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: HAMMERTON, Matthew
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3617
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4875/viewcontent/FundamentalDivEthics_av.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-4875
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-48752023-02-21T04:58:30Z The fundamental divisions in ethics HAMMERTON, Matthew What are the fundamental divisions in ethics? Which divisions capture the most important and basic options in moral theorizing? In this article, I reject the ‘Textbook View’ which takes the tripartite division between consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics to be fundamental. Instead, I suggest that moral theories are fundamentally divided into three independent divisions, which I call the neutral/relative division, the normative priority division, and the maximizing division. I argue that this account of the fundamental divisions of ethics better captures the main concerns that normative ethicists have when assessing moral theories. It also helps us make progress in comparative ethics and makes visible theoretical possibilities obscured by the Textbook View. 2022-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3617 info:doi/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2092906 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4875/viewcontent/FundamentalDivEthics_av.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University consequentialism deontology virtue ethics normative ethics comparative philosophy Ethics and Political Philosophy
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic consequentialism
deontology
virtue ethics
normative ethics
comparative philosophy
Ethics and Political Philosophy
spellingShingle consequentialism
deontology
virtue ethics
normative ethics
comparative philosophy
Ethics and Political Philosophy
HAMMERTON, Matthew
The fundamental divisions in ethics
description What are the fundamental divisions in ethics? Which divisions capture the most important and basic options in moral theorizing? In this article, I reject the ‘Textbook View’ which takes the tripartite division between consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics to be fundamental. Instead, I suggest that moral theories are fundamentally divided into three independent divisions, which I call the neutral/relative division, the normative priority division, and the maximizing division. I argue that this account of the fundamental divisions of ethics better captures the main concerns that normative ethicists have when assessing moral theories. It also helps us make progress in comparative ethics and makes visible theoretical possibilities obscured by the Textbook View.
format text
author HAMMERTON, Matthew
author_facet HAMMERTON, Matthew
author_sort HAMMERTON, Matthew
title The fundamental divisions in ethics
title_short The fundamental divisions in ethics
title_full The fundamental divisions in ethics
title_fullStr The fundamental divisions in ethics
title_full_unstemmed The fundamental divisions in ethics
title_sort fundamental divisions in ethics
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2022
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3617
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4875/viewcontent/FundamentalDivEthics_av.pdf
_version_ 1770576261926617088