Authoritarian propaganda campaigns on foreign affairs: four birds with one stone

Why do authoritarian states sometimes play up dangerous internationalcrises and embarrassing diplomatic incidents in domestic propaganda? Isit to mobilize, threaten, divert or pacify? Recent studies in comparativepolitics have focused on regime legitimacy and stability as key drivers ofauthoritarian...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: CHUBB, Andrew, WANG, Frances Yaping
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3683
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4941/viewcontent/Authoritarian.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-4941
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-49412023-01-19T09:34:04Z Authoritarian propaganda campaigns on foreign affairs: four birds with one stone CHUBB, Andrew WANG, Frances Yaping Why do authoritarian states sometimes play up dangerous internationalcrises and embarrassing diplomatic incidents in domestic propaganda? Isit to mobilize, threaten, divert or pacify? Recent studies in comparativepolitics have focused on regime legitimacy and stability as key drivers ofauthoritarian propaganda practices, overlooking other possiblemotivations such as mobilization of the regime’s domestic allies orstrategic signaling aimed at foreign audiences. Foreign policy analysts,meanwhile, have emphasized international dimensions of thepropaganda behavior of China — the contemporary world’s mostpowerful and technologically sophisticated authoritarian state — but haveoften mistakenly framed complementary theories as competingalternative explanations. Paying attention to the multiple domestic andinternational audiences for authoritarian propaganda, this articledemonstrates the logical and empirical compatibility of four supposedlycompeting explanations for propaganda campaigns on foreign policyissues: mobilization, signaling, diversion, and pacification. Afterelaborating the theoretical and observable implications of these fourexplanations, the article illustrates their simultaneous operation withinthe single case of China’s high-intensity propaganda campaign over the2016 South China Sea arbitration. 2023-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3683 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4941/viewcontent/Authoritarian.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Propaganda campaigns China Authoritarian states International conflicts Political Science
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Propaganda campaigns
China
Authoritarian states
International conflicts
Political Science
spellingShingle Propaganda campaigns
China
Authoritarian states
International conflicts
Political Science
CHUBB, Andrew
WANG, Frances Yaping
Authoritarian propaganda campaigns on foreign affairs: four birds with one stone
description Why do authoritarian states sometimes play up dangerous internationalcrises and embarrassing diplomatic incidents in domestic propaganda? Isit to mobilize, threaten, divert or pacify? Recent studies in comparativepolitics have focused on regime legitimacy and stability as key drivers ofauthoritarian propaganda practices, overlooking other possiblemotivations such as mobilization of the regime’s domestic allies orstrategic signaling aimed at foreign audiences. Foreign policy analysts,meanwhile, have emphasized international dimensions of thepropaganda behavior of China — the contemporary world’s mostpowerful and technologically sophisticated authoritarian state — but haveoften mistakenly framed complementary theories as competingalternative explanations. Paying attention to the multiple domestic andinternational audiences for authoritarian propaganda, this articledemonstrates the logical and empirical compatibility of four supposedlycompeting explanations for propaganda campaigns on foreign policyissues: mobilization, signaling, diversion, and pacification. Afterelaborating the theoretical and observable implications of these fourexplanations, the article illustrates their simultaneous operation withinthe single case of China’s high-intensity propaganda campaign over the2016 South China Sea arbitration.
format text
author CHUBB, Andrew
WANG, Frances Yaping
author_facet CHUBB, Andrew
WANG, Frances Yaping
author_sort CHUBB, Andrew
title Authoritarian propaganda campaigns on foreign affairs: four birds with one stone
title_short Authoritarian propaganda campaigns on foreign affairs: four birds with one stone
title_full Authoritarian propaganda campaigns on foreign affairs: four birds with one stone
title_fullStr Authoritarian propaganda campaigns on foreign affairs: four birds with one stone
title_full_unstemmed Authoritarian propaganda campaigns on foreign affairs: four birds with one stone
title_sort authoritarian propaganda campaigns on foreign affairs: four birds with one stone
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2023
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3683
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4941/viewcontent/Authoritarian.pdf
_version_ 1770576461372063744