Law and epistemology: An account of judgement
Three key components of a legal case are evidence, fact and judgement. In a well conducted judgement there will be an appropriate relation between these three components. Epistemologists investigating the nature of knowledge have been concerned with an analogous three components and their relation....
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3714 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-4972 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-49722023-01-19T07:54:03Z Law and epistemology: An account of judgement MI, Chienkuo RYAN, Shane Three key components of a legal case are evidence, fact and judgement. In a well conducted judgement there will be an appropriate relation between these three components. Epistemologists investigating the nature of knowledge have been concerned with an analogous three components and their relation. More specifically, epistemologists have been concerned with justification, truth, and belief and how these three components need to be related if there is to be knowledge. Given the analogy, the research of epistemologists plausibly has insights to offer to legal theorists. In fact, as we shall see, what epistemology have to offer legal theory actually goes beyond this as well. 2021-01-05T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3714 info:doi/10.1007/978-981-15-9639-1_7 Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University evidence fact judgement justification truth belief knowledge legal theory epistemologists Epistemology |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
evidence fact judgement justification truth belief knowledge legal theory epistemologists Epistemology |
spellingShingle |
evidence fact judgement justification truth belief knowledge legal theory epistemologists Epistemology MI, Chienkuo RYAN, Shane Law and epistemology: An account of judgement |
description |
Three key components of a legal case are evidence, fact and judgement. In a well conducted judgement there will be an appropriate relation between these three components. Epistemologists investigating the nature of knowledge have been concerned with an analogous three components and their relation. More specifically, epistemologists have been concerned with justification, truth, and belief and how these three components need to be related if there is to be knowledge. Given the analogy, the research of epistemologists plausibly has insights to offer to legal theorists. In fact, as we shall see, what epistemology have to offer legal theory actually goes beyond this as well. |
format |
text |
author |
MI, Chienkuo RYAN, Shane |
author_facet |
MI, Chienkuo RYAN, Shane |
author_sort |
MI, Chienkuo |
title |
Law and epistemology: An account of judgement |
title_short |
Law and epistemology: An account of judgement |
title_full |
Law and epistemology: An account of judgement |
title_fullStr |
Law and epistemology: An account of judgement |
title_full_unstemmed |
Law and epistemology: An account of judgement |
title_sort |
law and epistemology: an account of judgement |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3714 |
_version_ |
1770576463992455168 |