Policy design for sustainable energy and the interplay of procedural and substantive policy instruments

Contemporary research in the policy sciences places effectiveness as the central goal of policy design. This emphasis permeates both micro-level design considerations for specific policy calibrations, as well as more meso-level policy tool and tool mixes. Effective instrument design, therefore, augm...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: MUKHERJEE, Ishani
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3909
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-5167
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-51672024-01-25T06:30:03Z Policy design for sustainable energy and the interplay of procedural and substantive policy instruments MUKHERJEE, Ishani Contemporary research in the policy sciences places effectiveness as the central goal of policy design. This emphasis permeates both micro-level design considerations for specific policy calibrations, as well as more meso-level policy tool and tool mixes. Effective instrument design, therefore, augments the task of looking at individual tools with regard to considering them as tool ‘compounds’ that comprise substantive and procedural means which interact through the process of designing tools and the subsequent tool calibrations. Drawing on the discussion of policy tools, the academic study of environmental policy instruments has thus far proffered several perspectives on how they can individually be distinguished by their different substantive components and categorized based on common governance resources that need to be mobilized to create them. However, it is eventually how well policy tools are able to coordinate the support of common procedural means and how well they align their implementation plans which determine how effectively they work together as a deliberate environmental policy toolkit designed to meet a common aim of sustainability. In line with the growing literature on policy design and multi-component policy means, the author illustrates the notion of such substantive-procedural design compounds, by comparing what is known about the formulation of three classes of energy policies: renewable energy targets or quotas; feed-in tariffs; and net metering or smart grids. 2023-06-27T07:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3909 info:doi/10.4324/9781003043843 Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Environmental Policy
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Environmental Policy
spellingShingle Environmental Policy
MUKHERJEE, Ishani
Policy design for sustainable energy and the interplay of procedural and substantive policy instruments
description Contemporary research in the policy sciences places effectiveness as the central goal of policy design. This emphasis permeates both micro-level design considerations for specific policy calibrations, as well as more meso-level policy tool and tool mixes. Effective instrument design, therefore, augments the task of looking at individual tools with regard to considering them as tool ‘compounds’ that comprise substantive and procedural means which interact through the process of designing tools and the subsequent tool calibrations. Drawing on the discussion of policy tools, the academic study of environmental policy instruments has thus far proffered several perspectives on how they can individually be distinguished by their different substantive components and categorized based on common governance resources that need to be mobilized to create them. However, it is eventually how well policy tools are able to coordinate the support of common procedural means and how well they align their implementation plans which determine how effectively they work together as a deliberate environmental policy toolkit designed to meet a common aim of sustainability. In line with the growing literature on policy design and multi-component policy means, the author illustrates the notion of such substantive-procedural design compounds, by comparing what is known about the formulation of three classes of energy policies: renewable energy targets or quotas; feed-in tariffs; and net metering or smart grids.
format text
author MUKHERJEE, Ishani
author_facet MUKHERJEE, Ishani
author_sort MUKHERJEE, Ishani
title Policy design for sustainable energy and the interplay of procedural and substantive policy instruments
title_short Policy design for sustainable energy and the interplay of procedural and substantive policy instruments
title_full Policy design for sustainable energy and the interplay of procedural and substantive policy instruments
title_fullStr Policy design for sustainable energy and the interplay of procedural and substantive policy instruments
title_full_unstemmed Policy design for sustainable energy and the interplay of procedural and substantive policy instruments
title_sort policy design for sustainable energy and the interplay of procedural and substantive policy instruments
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2023
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3909
_version_ 1789483291853717504