Bibliometric analysis of academic papers citing Dunleavy et al.’s (2006) “New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance”: Identifying research clusters and future research agendas

Bibliometric analysis of academic papers citing Dunleavy et al.’s (2006) “New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance”: Identifying research clusters and future research agendas

I trace the bibliometric evolution of “New Public Management Is Dead” by Dunleavy et al. to investigate how the seminal paper influenced the administrative reform debate. They suggested Digital-Era Governance as the main post-NPM idea. My bibliometric analysis discovers public value, administrative...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: CHO, Beomgeun
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2023
Subjects:
administrative reform
bibliometric analysis
digital government
network analysis
new public management
Political Science
Scholarly Publishing
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3955
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5213/viewcontent/cho_2023_bibliometric_analysis_of_academic_papers_citing_dunleavy_av.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-5213
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-52132024-07-17T06:14:30Z Bibliometric analysis of academic papers citing Dunleavy et al.’s (2006) “New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance”: Identifying research clusters and future research agendas CHO, Beomgeun I trace the bibliometric evolution of “New Public Management Is Dead” by Dunleavy et al. to investigate how the seminal paper influenced the administrative reform debate. They suggested Digital-Era Governance as the main post-NPM idea. My bibliometric analysis discovers public value, administrative reform trajectories, and digital government as influential themes. Unlike Dunleavy et al., the literature found the managerial reform wave is not linear, reform ideas are supplementary, and NPM remains a major toolkit. Future research should focus on reintegration and need-based holism, linking digital government to administrative reform, and the negative impact of digital government on democracy. 2023-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3955 info:doi/10.1177/00953997231157753 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5213/viewcontent/cho_2023_bibliometric_analysis_of_academic_papers_citing_dunleavy_av.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University administrative reform bibliometric analysis digital government network analysis new public management Political Science Scholarly Publishing
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic administrative reform
bibliometric analysis
digital government
network analysis
new public management
Political Science
Scholarly Publishing
spellingShingle administrative reform
bibliometric analysis
digital government
network analysis
new public management
Political Science
Scholarly Publishing
CHO, Beomgeun
Bibliometric analysis of academic papers citing Dunleavy et al.’s (2006) “New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance”: Identifying research clusters and future research agendas
description I trace the bibliometric evolution of “New Public Management Is Dead” by Dunleavy et al. to investigate how the seminal paper influenced the administrative reform debate. They suggested Digital-Era Governance as the main post-NPM idea. My bibliometric analysis discovers public value, administrative reform trajectories, and digital government as influential themes. Unlike Dunleavy et al., the literature found the managerial reform wave is not linear, reform ideas are supplementary, and NPM remains a major toolkit. Future research should focus on reintegration and need-based holism, linking digital government to administrative reform, and the negative impact of digital government on democracy.
format text
author CHO, Beomgeun
author_facet CHO, Beomgeun
author_sort CHO, Beomgeun
title Bibliometric analysis of academic papers citing Dunleavy et al.’s (2006) “New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance”: Identifying research clusters and future research agendas
title_short Bibliometric analysis of academic papers citing Dunleavy et al.’s (2006) “New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance”: Identifying research clusters and future research agendas
title_full Bibliometric analysis of academic papers citing Dunleavy et al.’s (2006) “New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance”: Identifying research clusters and future research agendas
title_fullStr Bibliometric analysis of academic papers citing Dunleavy et al.’s (2006) “New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance”: Identifying research clusters and future research agendas
title_full_unstemmed Bibliometric analysis of academic papers citing Dunleavy et al.’s (2006) “New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance”: Identifying research clusters and future research agendas
title_sort bibliometric analysis of academic papers citing dunleavy et al.’s (2006) “new public management is dead—long live digital-era governance”: identifying research clusters and future research agendas
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2023
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3955
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5213/viewcontent/cho_2023_bibliometric_analysis_of_academic_papers_citing_dunleavy_av.pdf
_version_ 1814047675265318912

Similar Items