Dumbing down?: Trends in the complexity of political communication
Commentators and some political scholars claim to have observed a “dumbing down” in the level of sophistication of political language, leading to anxiety over the quality of democratic deliberation, knowledge, policy design, and implementation. This work typically focuses on the president’s State of...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3975 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5233/viewcontent/BenoitMungerSpirling_SSRCchapter.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-5233 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-52332024-09-02T06:25:06Z Dumbing down?: Trends in the complexity of political communication BENOIT, Kenneth MUNGER, Kevin SPIRLING, Arthur Commentators and some political scholars claim to have observed a “dumbing down” in the level of sophistication of political language, leading to anxiety over the quality of democratic deliberation, knowledge, policy design, and implementation. This work typically focuses on the president’s State of the Union addresses. Using quantitative indicators of textual complexity, we measure trends since 1790 in that and other key political corpora, including rulings of the Supreme Court, the Congressional Record, and presidential executive orders. To draw comparative lessons, we also study political texts from the United Kingdom, in the form of party broadcasts and manifestos. Not only do we cast shade on the supposed relentless simplification of the State of the Union corpus, we show that this trend is not evident in other forms of elite political communication, including presidential ones. Finally, we argue that a stylistic—rather than an obviously substantive—shift toward shorter sentences is driving much of the variation over time we see in traditional measures of political sophistication. 2019-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3975 info:doi/10.1017/9781108667357.009 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5233/viewcontent/BenoitMungerSpirling_SSRCchapter.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Dumbing down Measurement Political communication Political methodology State of the Union Text as data Political Science Social Influence and Political Communication |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Dumbing down Measurement Political communication Political methodology State of the Union Text as data Political Science Social Influence and Political Communication |
spellingShingle |
Dumbing down Measurement Political communication Political methodology State of the Union Text as data Political Science Social Influence and Political Communication BENOIT, Kenneth MUNGER, Kevin SPIRLING, Arthur Dumbing down?: Trends in the complexity of political communication |
description |
Commentators and some political scholars claim to have observed a “dumbing down” in the level of sophistication of political language, leading to anxiety over the quality of democratic deliberation, knowledge, policy design, and implementation. This work typically focuses on the president’s State of the Union addresses. Using quantitative indicators of textual complexity, we measure trends since 1790 in that and other key political corpora, including rulings of the Supreme Court, the Congressional Record, and presidential executive orders. To draw comparative lessons, we also study political texts from the United Kingdom, in the form of party broadcasts and manifestos. Not only do we cast shade on the supposed relentless simplification of the State of the Union corpus, we show that this trend is not evident in other forms of elite political communication, including presidential ones. Finally, we argue that a stylistic—rather than an obviously substantive—shift toward shorter sentences is driving much of the variation over time we see in traditional measures of political sophistication. |
format |
text |
author |
BENOIT, Kenneth MUNGER, Kevin SPIRLING, Arthur |
author_facet |
BENOIT, Kenneth MUNGER, Kevin SPIRLING, Arthur |
author_sort |
BENOIT, Kenneth |
title |
Dumbing down?: Trends in the complexity of political communication |
title_short |
Dumbing down?: Trends in the complexity of political communication |
title_full |
Dumbing down?: Trends in the complexity of political communication |
title_fullStr |
Dumbing down?: Trends in the complexity of political communication |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dumbing down?: Trends in the complexity of political communication |
title_sort |
dumbing down?: trends in the complexity of political communication |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3975 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5233/viewcontent/BenoitMungerSpirling_SSRCchapter.pdf |
_version_ |
1814047824987291648 |