Dumbing down?: Trends in the complexity of political communication

Commentators and some political scholars claim to have observed a “dumbing down” in the level of sophistication of political language, leading to anxiety over the quality of democratic deliberation, knowledge, policy design, and implementation. This work typically focuses on the president’s State of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: BENOIT, Kenneth, MUNGER, Kevin, SPIRLING, Arthur
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3975
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5233/viewcontent/BenoitMungerSpirling_SSRCchapter.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-5233
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-52332024-09-02T06:25:06Z Dumbing down?: Trends in the complexity of political communication BENOIT, Kenneth MUNGER, Kevin SPIRLING, Arthur Commentators and some political scholars claim to have observed a “dumbing down” in the level of sophistication of political language, leading to anxiety over the quality of democratic deliberation, knowledge, policy design, and implementation. This work typically focuses on the president’s State of the Union addresses. Using quantitative indicators of textual complexity, we measure trends since 1790 in that and other key political corpora, including rulings of the Supreme Court, the Congressional Record, and presidential executive orders. To draw comparative lessons, we also study political texts from the United Kingdom, in the form of party broadcasts and manifestos. Not only do we cast shade on the supposed relentless simplification of the State of the Union corpus, we show that this trend is not evident in other forms of elite political communication, including presidential ones. Finally, we argue that a stylistic—rather than an obviously substantive—shift toward shorter sentences is driving much of the variation over time we see in traditional measures of political sophistication. 2019-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3975 info:doi/10.1017/9781108667357.009 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5233/viewcontent/BenoitMungerSpirling_SSRCchapter.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Dumbing down Measurement Political communication Political methodology State of the Union Text as data Political Science Social Influence and Political Communication
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Dumbing down
Measurement
Political communication
Political methodology
State of the Union
Text as data
Political Science
Social Influence and Political Communication
spellingShingle Dumbing down
Measurement
Political communication
Political methodology
State of the Union
Text as data
Political Science
Social Influence and Political Communication
BENOIT, Kenneth
MUNGER, Kevin
SPIRLING, Arthur
Dumbing down?: Trends in the complexity of political communication
description Commentators and some political scholars claim to have observed a “dumbing down” in the level of sophistication of political language, leading to anxiety over the quality of democratic deliberation, knowledge, policy design, and implementation. This work typically focuses on the president’s State of the Union addresses. Using quantitative indicators of textual complexity, we measure trends since 1790 in that and other key political corpora, including rulings of the Supreme Court, the Congressional Record, and presidential executive orders. To draw comparative lessons, we also study political texts from the United Kingdom, in the form of party broadcasts and manifestos. Not only do we cast shade on the supposed relentless simplification of the State of the Union corpus, we show that this trend is not evident in other forms of elite political communication, including presidential ones. Finally, we argue that a stylistic—rather than an obviously substantive—shift toward shorter sentences is driving much of the variation over time we see in traditional measures of political sophistication.
format text
author BENOIT, Kenneth
MUNGER, Kevin
SPIRLING, Arthur
author_facet BENOIT, Kenneth
MUNGER, Kevin
SPIRLING, Arthur
author_sort BENOIT, Kenneth
title Dumbing down?: Trends in the complexity of political communication
title_short Dumbing down?: Trends in the complexity of political communication
title_full Dumbing down?: Trends in the complexity of political communication
title_fullStr Dumbing down?: Trends in the complexity of political communication
title_full_unstemmed Dumbing down?: Trends in the complexity of political communication
title_sort dumbing down?: trends in the complexity of political communication
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2019
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3975
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5233/viewcontent/BenoitMungerSpirling_SSRCchapter.pdf
_version_ 1814047824987291648