Compared to what? A comment on "A robust transformation procedure for interpreting political text" by Martin and Vanberg
In “A Robust Transformation Procedure,” Martin and Vanberg (2007, hereafter MV) propose a new method for rescaling the raw virgin text scores produced by the “Wordscores” procedure of Laver, Benoit, and Garry (2003, hereafter LBG). Their alternative method addresses two deficiencies they argue exist...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | BENOIT, Kenneth, LAVER, Michael |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2008
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/4042 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5300/viewcontent/compared_to_what_a_comment_av.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Scaling policy preferences from coded political texts
by: LOWE, Will, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data
by: LAVER, Michael, et al.
Published: (2003) -
Natural sentences as valid units for coded political texts
by: DAUBLER, Thomas, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Benchmarks for text analysis: A response to Budge and Pennings
by: BENOIT, Kenneth, et al.
Published: (2007) -
Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data
by: BENOIT, Kenneth, et al.
Published: (2016)