Models of electoral system change

Electoral systems are commonly treated as exogenous determinants of political party systems, yet our theoretical understanding remains limited as to how these institutions themselves are determined. Part of the problem lies with the subject matter itself: electoral system change is frequently idiosy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: BENOIT, Kenneth
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/4047
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5305/viewcontent/benoit_MES_pv.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-5305
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-53052024-09-21T15:38:48Z Models of electoral system change BENOIT, Kenneth Electoral systems are commonly treated as exogenous determinants of political party systems, yet our theoretical understanding remains limited as to how these institutions themselves are determined. Part of the problem lies with the subject matter itself: electoral system change is frequently idiosyncratic, often occurring during episodes of exceptional political change. Yet another aspect of the problem is that explanations of electoral system change frequently occur piecemeal in application to specific cases, without systematic or comparative development. Addressing both problems, I first survey the existing literature to develop a comprehensive typology of explanations of electoral system change and persistence. I then set forth a theory predicting the conditions under which electoral systems should change, linking motivations for institutional change to instrumentally rational political parties seeking to maximize their legislative seat shares. The theory predicts that electoral laws will change when a coalition of parties exists such that each party in the coalition expects to gain more seats under an alternative electoral institution, and that also has sufficient power to effect this alternative through fiat given the rules for changing electoral laws. To contrast this model to other explanations of electoral system change, I point to its observable implications and outline how it could be confirmed or disconfirmed in empirical research. The comparison also highlights limitations in other approaches to explaining electoral system change, and underscores the importance of institutions in inducing equilibriums in both electoral systems and party systems. 2004-09-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/4047 info:doi/10.1016/S0261-3794(03)00020-9 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5305/viewcontent/benoit_MES_pv.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Electoral systems Institutional change Institutional origins Election Law Political Science
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Electoral systems
Institutional change
Institutional origins
Election Law
Political Science
spellingShingle Electoral systems
Institutional change
Institutional origins
Election Law
Political Science
BENOIT, Kenneth
Models of electoral system change
description Electoral systems are commonly treated as exogenous determinants of political party systems, yet our theoretical understanding remains limited as to how these institutions themselves are determined. Part of the problem lies with the subject matter itself: electoral system change is frequently idiosyncratic, often occurring during episodes of exceptional political change. Yet another aspect of the problem is that explanations of electoral system change frequently occur piecemeal in application to specific cases, without systematic or comparative development. Addressing both problems, I first survey the existing literature to develop a comprehensive typology of explanations of electoral system change and persistence. I then set forth a theory predicting the conditions under which electoral systems should change, linking motivations for institutional change to instrumentally rational political parties seeking to maximize their legislative seat shares. The theory predicts that electoral laws will change when a coalition of parties exists such that each party in the coalition expects to gain more seats under an alternative electoral institution, and that also has sufficient power to effect this alternative through fiat given the rules for changing electoral laws. To contrast this model to other explanations of electoral system change, I point to its observable implications and outline how it could be confirmed or disconfirmed in empirical research. The comparison also highlights limitations in other approaches to explaining electoral system change, and underscores the importance of institutions in inducing equilibriums in both electoral systems and party systems.
format text
author BENOIT, Kenneth
author_facet BENOIT, Kenneth
author_sort BENOIT, Kenneth
title Models of electoral system change
title_short Models of electoral system change
title_full Models of electoral system change
title_fullStr Models of electoral system change
title_full_unstemmed Models of electoral system change
title_sort models of electoral system change
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2004
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/4047
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5305/viewcontent/benoit_MES_pv.pdf
_version_ 1814047887900803072