Cultivating power: Gardens in the global politics of diplomacy, war, and peace

Although gardens are typically appreciated as peaceful spaces of apolitical serenity, this article highlights how gardens can provide new sites and sensibilities that complicate our understanding of diplomacy, war, and peace. While gardens are a popular location for diplomatic performances—for examp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: CALLAHAN, William A.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/4166
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5425/viewcontent/CultivatingPower_av.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-5425
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-54252025-02-19T05:14:41Z Cultivating power: Gardens in the global politics of diplomacy, war, and peace CALLAHAN, William A. Although gardens are typically appreciated as peaceful spaces of apolitical serenity, this article highlights how gardens can provide new sites and sensibilities that complicate our understanding of diplomacy, war, and peace. While gardens are a popular location for diplomatic performances—for example, the Treaty of Versailles—the global politics of gardens remains underresearched in international relations (IR). To address this gap, the article follows the “aesthetic turn” in IR to examine gardens as contingent social constructions of social-ordering and world-ordering, which both shape and participate in global politics. In particular, it develops a framework to examine how peace-war becomes intelligible in gardens through contingent conceptual dynamics such as “civility/martiality.” It then employs the framework to explore how two key national memorial sites—the Nanjing Massacre Memorial in China and the Yasukuni Shrine in Japan—work as gardens to creatively perform civility and martiality in unexpected ways. Such an oblique intervention underlines how war memorials, gardens, and other odd IR sites are not stable containers of meaning but need to be actively (re)interpreted as performances of cultural governance and resistance. Garden-building here is theory-building: by producing new sites and sensibilities of global politics, it creatively shapes our understanding of IR. 2017-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/4166 info:doi/10.1093/ips/olx017 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5425/viewcontent/CultivatingPower_av.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University International Relations Political Science
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic International Relations
Political Science
spellingShingle International Relations
Political Science
CALLAHAN, William A.
Cultivating power: Gardens in the global politics of diplomacy, war, and peace
description Although gardens are typically appreciated as peaceful spaces of apolitical serenity, this article highlights how gardens can provide new sites and sensibilities that complicate our understanding of diplomacy, war, and peace. While gardens are a popular location for diplomatic performances—for example, the Treaty of Versailles—the global politics of gardens remains underresearched in international relations (IR). To address this gap, the article follows the “aesthetic turn” in IR to examine gardens as contingent social constructions of social-ordering and world-ordering, which both shape and participate in global politics. In particular, it develops a framework to examine how peace-war becomes intelligible in gardens through contingent conceptual dynamics such as “civility/martiality.” It then employs the framework to explore how two key national memorial sites—the Nanjing Massacre Memorial in China and the Yasukuni Shrine in Japan—work as gardens to creatively perform civility and martiality in unexpected ways. Such an oblique intervention underlines how war memorials, gardens, and other odd IR sites are not stable containers of meaning but need to be actively (re)interpreted as performances of cultural governance and resistance. Garden-building here is theory-building: by producing new sites and sensibilities of global politics, it creatively shapes our understanding of IR.
format text
author CALLAHAN, William A.
author_facet CALLAHAN, William A.
author_sort CALLAHAN, William A.
title Cultivating power: Gardens in the global politics of diplomacy, war, and peace
title_short Cultivating power: Gardens in the global politics of diplomacy, war, and peace
title_full Cultivating power: Gardens in the global politics of diplomacy, war, and peace
title_fullStr Cultivating power: Gardens in the global politics of diplomacy, war, and peace
title_full_unstemmed Cultivating power: Gardens in the global politics of diplomacy, war, and peace
title_sort cultivating power: gardens in the global politics of diplomacy, war, and peace
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2017
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/4166
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/5425/viewcontent/CultivatingPower_av.pdf
_version_ 1827070809524404224