Accuracy of Miniscrew Implant Placement With a 3-Dimensional Surgical Guide

Purpose: Deviation in the trajectory during drilling or tapping of miniscrew implants increases the risks of root injury. The purposes of this study were to assess the accuracy of miniscrew placement into the dentoalveolar bone, aided by a 3-dimensional (3D) surgical guide, and to compare the result...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suzuki E.Y., Suzuki B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-43449089485&partnerID=40&md5=7d4f95898c9cfcf50375d8ac709b7235
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18486791
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1028
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-1028
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-10282014-08-29T09:17:37Z Accuracy of Miniscrew Implant Placement With a 3-Dimensional Surgical Guide Suzuki E.Y. Suzuki B. Purpose: Deviation in the trajectory during drilling or tapping of miniscrew implants increases the risks of root injury. The purposes of this study were to assess the accuracy of miniscrew placement into the dentoalveolar bone, aided by a 3-dimensional (3D) surgical guide, and to compare the results with those from conventional procedures. Materials and Methods: A total of 220 miniscrews implanted, aided by a 3D surgical guide (n = 180), a conventional wire guide (n = 20), or no surgical guide (n = 20), were retrospectively examined in relation to the accuracy of placement. Coordinates, distances, and angles of the superimposed images of the planned and the correspondent implants were assessed and analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance. Results: The results demonstrate that using the 3D surgical guide produced a significantly smaller variation between the planned and actual implant positions at the miniscrew head and tail (0.6 ± 0.5 mm [mean ± standard deviation] and 2.0 ± 0.4 mm) compared with the wire guide (1.0 ± 0.4 mm and 5.3 ± 1.1 mm) and no guide (3.6 ± 1.7 mm and 10.5 ± 3.5 mm). The accuracy of placement was significantly improved with the 3D surgical guide (1.8 ± 0.9°) compared with the wire guide (16.9 ± 2.6°) and no guide (21.2 ± 2.9°). Conclusions: The 3D surgical guide provides a precise method for miniscrew placement into the dentoalveolar bone. The accurate insertion of miniscrews using the 3D surgical guide allows orthodontists to precisely transfer the radiographic information from preoperative planning to the surgical site, thus minimizing the risks of root injury. © 2008 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2014-08-29T09:17:37Z 2014-08-29T09:17:37Z 2008 Article 02782391 10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.047 18486791 JOMSD http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-43449089485&partnerID=40&md5=7d4f95898c9cfcf50375d8ac709b7235 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18486791 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1028 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Purpose: Deviation in the trajectory during drilling or tapping of miniscrew implants increases the risks of root injury. The purposes of this study were to assess the accuracy of miniscrew placement into the dentoalveolar bone, aided by a 3-dimensional (3D) surgical guide, and to compare the results with those from conventional procedures. Materials and Methods: A total of 220 miniscrews implanted, aided by a 3D surgical guide (n = 180), a conventional wire guide (n = 20), or no surgical guide (n = 20), were retrospectively examined in relation to the accuracy of placement. Coordinates, distances, and angles of the superimposed images of the planned and the correspondent implants were assessed and analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance. Results: The results demonstrate that using the 3D surgical guide produced a significantly smaller variation between the planned and actual implant positions at the miniscrew head and tail (0.6 ± 0.5 mm [mean ± standard deviation] and 2.0 ± 0.4 mm) compared with the wire guide (1.0 ± 0.4 mm and 5.3 ± 1.1 mm) and no guide (3.6 ± 1.7 mm and 10.5 ± 3.5 mm). The accuracy of placement was significantly improved with the 3D surgical guide (1.8 ± 0.9°) compared with the wire guide (16.9 ± 2.6°) and no guide (21.2 ± 2.9°). Conclusions: The 3D surgical guide provides a precise method for miniscrew placement into the dentoalveolar bone. The accurate insertion of miniscrews using the 3D surgical guide allows orthodontists to precisely transfer the radiographic information from preoperative planning to the surgical site, thus minimizing the risks of root injury. © 2008 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
format Article
author Suzuki E.Y.
Suzuki B.
spellingShingle Suzuki E.Y.
Suzuki B.
Accuracy of Miniscrew Implant Placement With a 3-Dimensional Surgical Guide
author_facet Suzuki E.Y.
Suzuki B.
author_sort Suzuki E.Y.
title Accuracy of Miniscrew Implant Placement With a 3-Dimensional Surgical Guide
title_short Accuracy of Miniscrew Implant Placement With a 3-Dimensional Surgical Guide
title_full Accuracy of Miniscrew Implant Placement With a 3-Dimensional Surgical Guide
title_fullStr Accuracy of Miniscrew Implant Placement With a 3-Dimensional Surgical Guide
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Miniscrew Implant Placement With a 3-Dimensional Surgical Guide
title_sort accuracy of miniscrew implant placement with a 3-dimensional surgical guide
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-43449089485&partnerID=40&md5=7d4f95898c9cfcf50375d8ac709b7235
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18486791
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1028
_version_ 1681419579906064384