Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) in detecting vertical root fractures and to compare the accuracy with images from an intraoral sensor and from conventional intraoral film. Methods: 60 extracted, single-rooted human teeth were divided equally into t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kambungton J., Janhom A., Prapayasatok S., Pongsiriwet S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3502482
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84856685330&partnerID=40&md5=7b3fa6e97165b5ba13868350dfa02702
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1076
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-1076
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-10762014-08-29T09:17:43Z Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film Kambungton J. Janhom A. Prapayasatok S. Pongsiriwet S. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) in detecting vertical root fractures and to compare the accuracy with images from an intraoral sensor and from conventional intraoral film. Methods: 60 extracted, single-rooted human teeth were divided equally into two groups: a control group of 30 teeth and an induced fracture group of 30 teeth. All teeth were randomly placed into sockets in six dry mandibles. Each tooth was imaged by three modalities: CBCT, intraoral digital radiography and intraoral F-speed film. Three beam angulations (an orthogonal projection and additional projections with ±20° horizontal shifts of the central ray) were used when radiographs were made using film and a digital sensor. Three oral and maxillofacial radiologists evaluated the presence of root fractures twice in each image modality using a five-point confidence rating scale. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (Az) were computed for each observer and modality and were tested for statistical differences using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: There was no statistical difference in the performance of the three modalities (mean of Az values: CBCT 5 0.811, film 5 0.797 and sensor 5 0.775; p=0.771). Conclusions: There was no significant difference between intraoral film, a high-resolution complementary metal oxide semiconductor digital imaging system and CBCT in detecting vertical root fractures in mandibular single-rooted teeth. © 2012 The British Institute of Radiology. 2014-08-29T09:17:43Z 2014-08-29T09:17:43Z 2012 Article 0250832X 10.1259/dmfr/49798768 22301636 DREAC http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3502482 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84856685330&partnerID=40&md5=7b3fa6e97165b5ba13868350dfa02702 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1076 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) in detecting vertical root fractures and to compare the accuracy with images from an intraoral sensor and from conventional intraoral film. Methods: 60 extracted, single-rooted human teeth were divided equally into two groups: a control group of 30 teeth and an induced fracture group of 30 teeth. All teeth were randomly placed into sockets in six dry mandibles. Each tooth was imaged by three modalities: CBCT, intraoral digital radiography and intraoral F-speed film. Three beam angulations (an orthogonal projection and additional projections with ±20° horizontal shifts of the central ray) were used when radiographs were made using film and a digital sensor. Three oral and maxillofacial radiologists evaluated the presence of root fractures twice in each image modality using a five-point confidence rating scale. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (Az) were computed for each observer and modality and were tested for statistical differences using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: There was no statistical difference in the performance of the three modalities (mean of Az values: CBCT 5 0.811, film 5 0.797 and sensor 5 0.775; p=0.771). Conclusions: There was no significant difference between intraoral film, a high-resolution complementary metal oxide semiconductor digital imaging system and CBCT in detecting vertical root fractures in mandibular single-rooted teeth. © 2012 The British Institute of Radiology.
format Article
author Kambungton J.
Janhom A.
Prapayasatok S.
Pongsiriwet S.
spellingShingle Kambungton J.
Janhom A.
Prapayasatok S.
Pongsiriwet S.
Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film
author_facet Kambungton J.
Janhom A.
Prapayasatok S.
Pongsiriwet S.
author_sort Kambungton J.
title Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film
title_short Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film
title_full Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film
title_fullStr Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film
title_sort assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: cone beam ct, intraoral digital radiography and film
publishDate 2014
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3502482
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84856685330&partnerID=40&md5=7b3fa6e97165b5ba13868350dfa02702
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1076
_version_ 1681419588879777792