A novel fuzzy co-occurrence matrix for texture feature extraction

Texture analysis is one of the important steps in many computer vision applications. One of the important parts in texture analysis is texture classification. This classification is not an easy problem since texture can be non-uniform due to many reasons, e.g., rotation, scale, and etc. To help in t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Munklang Y., Auephanwiriyakul S., Theera-Umpon N.
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84880735297&partnerID=40&md5=57dd216652ba65bb2cde9733d2837404
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1638
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-1638
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-16382014-08-29T09:29:33Z A novel fuzzy co-occurrence matrix for texture feature extraction Munklang Y. Auephanwiriyakul S. Theera-Umpon N. Texture analysis is one of the important steps in many computer vision applications. One of the important parts in texture analysis is texture classification. This classification is not an easy problem since texture can be non-uniform due to many reasons, e.g., rotation, scale, and etc. To help in this process, a good feature extraction method is needed. In this paper, we incorporate the fuzzy C-means (FCM) into the gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). In particular, we utilize the result from FCM to compute eight fuzzy co-occurrence matrices for each direction. There are four features, i.e., contrast, correlation, energy, and homogeneity, computed from each fuzzy co-occurrence matrix. We then test our features with the multiclass support vector machine (one-versus-all strategy) on the UIUC, UMD, Kylberg, and the Brodatz data sets. We also compare the classification result using the same set of feature extracted from the GLCM. The experimental results show that the features extracted from our fuzzy co-occurrence matrix yields a better classification performance than that from the regular GLCM. The best results on validation set using the features computed from our fuzzy co-occurrence are 77%, 95%, 99.11%, and 98.44% on the UIUC, UMD, Kylberg, and Brodatz, respectively, whereas those on the same data sets using the features from the gray level co-occurrence are 53%, 85%, 82.81%, and 95.31%, respectively. The best result on the blind test set of Brodatz data set using our fuzzy co-occurrence is 92.19%, whereas that from the gray level co-occurrence is 85.74%. Since the blind test data set is a rotated version of the training data set, we may conclude from the experiment that our features provide better property of rotation invariance. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 2014-08-29T09:29:33Z 2014-08-29T09:29:33Z 2013 Conference Paper 9783642396458 03029743 10.1007/978-3-642-39646-5_18 97954 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84880735297&partnerID=40&md5=57dd216652ba65bb2cde9733d2837404 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1638 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Texture analysis is one of the important steps in many computer vision applications. One of the important parts in texture analysis is texture classification. This classification is not an easy problem since texture can be non-uniform due to many reasons, e.g., rotation, scale, and etc. To help in this process, a good feature extraction method is needed. In this paper, we incorporate the fuzzy C-means (FCM) into the gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). In particular, we utilize the result from FCM to compute eight fuzzy co-occurrence matrices for each direction. There are four features, i.e., contrast, correlation, energy, and homogeneity, computed from each fuzzy co-occurrence matrix. We then test our features with the multiclass support vector machine (one-versus-all strategy) on the UIUC, UMD, Kylberg, and the Brodatz data sets. We also compare the classification result using the same set of feature extracted from the GLCM. The experimental results show that the features extracted from our fuzzy co-occurrence matrix yields a better classification performance than that from the regular GLCM. The best results on validation set using the features computed from our fuzzy co-occurrence are 77%, 95%, 99.11%, and 98.44% on the UIUC, UMD, Kylberg, and Brodatz, respectively, whereas those on the same data sets using the features from the gray level co-occurrence are 53%, 85%, 82.81%, and 95.31%, respectively. The best result on the blind test set of Brodatz data set using our fuzzy co-occurrence is 92.19%, whereas that from the gray level co-occurrence is 85.74%. Since the blind test data set is a rotated version of the training data set, we may conclude from the experiment that our features provide better property of rotation invariance. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Munklang Y.
Auephanwiriyakul S.
Theera-Umpon N.
spellingShingle Munklang Y.
Auephanwiriyakul S.
Theera-Umpon N.
A novel fuzzy co-occurrence matrix for texture feature extraction
author_facet Munklang Y.
Auephanwiriyakul S.
Theera-Umpon N.
author_sort Munklang Y.
title A novel fuzzy co-occurrence matrix for texture feature extraction
title_short A novel fuzzy co-occurrence matrix for texture feature extraction
title_full A novel fuzzy co-occurrence matrix for texture feature extraction
title_fullStr A novel fuzzy co-occurrence matrix for texture feature extraction
title_full_unstemmed A novel fuzzy co-occurrence matrix for texture feature extraction
title_sort novel fuzzy co-occurrence matrix for texture feature extraction
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84880735297&partnerID=40&md5=57dd216652ba65bb2cde9733d2837404
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1638
_version_ 1681419707788296192