Staplers versus hand-sewing for pulmonary lobectomy: Randomized controlled trial

Background: division of the parenchymal lung for lobectomy is performed in patients who have an incomplete fissure. A stapler device can reduce postoperative air leak, but it is expensive. Objective: to investigate the advantage of using a stapler, in terms of postoperative air leak and cost, compar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tantraworasin A., Seateang S., Bunchungmongkol N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84894112567&partnerID=40&md5=6d56e998bac864042f38317be9d6343c
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24585907
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1678
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-1678
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-16782014-08-30T01:59:53Z Staplers versus hand-sewing for pulmonary lobectomy: Randomized controlled trial Tantraworasin A. Seateang S. Bunchungmongkol N. Background: division of the parenchymal lung for lobectomy is performed in patients who have an incomplete fissure. A stapler device can reduce postoperative air leak, but it is expensive. Objective: to investigate the advantage of using a stapler, in terms of postoperative air leak and cost, compared to handsewn techniques. Method: a non-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted in Chiang Mai University Hospital, Thailand, from November 15, 2011 to September 30, 2012. Fifty-three adult patients were randomized to undergo a hand-sewn technique (27 patients) or stapler closure (26 patients). Results: postoperative air leak in the stapler group was less than that in the hand-sewn group (7.7% vs. 29.6%, p=0.044), and the duration of air leak in the stapler group was significantly shorter than that in the hand-sewn group (1.0 vs. 13.4 days, p=0.032). The cost of treatment was not significantly different between groups; however, the total cost in the stapler group was less than that in the hand-sewn group (mean difference 4454 Thai baht (US 144.75). Conclusion: a stapler reduces postoperative air leaks and the duration of air leaks. Furthermore, the total cost of treatment was comparable. Therefore, using staples may provide substantial financial benefits. 2014-08-30T01:59:53Z 2014-08-30T01:59:53Z 2014 Article 02184923 10.1177/0218492313491754 ACTAF http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84894112567&partnerID=40&md5=6d56e998bac864042f38317be9d6343c http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24585907 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1678 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Background: division of the parenchymal lung for lobectomy is performed in patients who have an incomplete fissure. A stapler device can reduce postoperative air leak, but it is expensive. Objective: to investigate the advantage of using a stapler, in terms of postoperative air leak and cost, compared to handsewn techniques. Method: a non-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted in Chiang Mai University Hospital, Thailand, from November 15, 2011 to September 30, 2012. Fifty-three adult patients were randomized to undergo a hand-sewn technique (27 patients) or stapler closure (26 patients). Results: postoperative air leak in the stapler group was less than that in the hand-sewn group (7.7% vs. 29.6%, p=0.044), and the duration of air leak in the stapler group was significantly shorter than that in the hand-sewn group (1.0 vs. 13.4 days, p=0.032). The cost of treatment was not significantly different between groups; however, the total cost in the stapler group was less than that in the hand-sewn group (mean difference 4454 Thai baht (US 144.75). Conclusion: a stapler reduces postoperative air leaks and the duration of air leaks. Furthermore, the total cost of treatment was comparable. Therefore, using staples may provide substantial financial benefits.
format Article
author Tantraworasin A.
Seateang S.
Bunchungmongkol N.
spellingShingle Tantraworasin A.
Seateang S.
Bunchungmongkol N.
Staplers versus hand-sewing for pulmonary lobectomy: Randomized controlled trial
author_facet Tantraworasin A.
Seateang S.
Bunchungmongkol N.
author_sort Tantraworasin A.
title Staplers versus hand-sewing for pulmonary lobectomy: Randomized controlled trial
title_short Staplers versus hand-sewing for pulmonary lobectomy: Randomized controlled trial
title_full Staplers versus hand-sewing for pulmonary lobectomy: Randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Staplers versus hand-sewing for pulmonary lobectomy: Randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Staplers versus hand-sewing for pulmonary lobectomy: Randomized controlled trial
title_sort staplers versus hand-sewing for pulmonary lobectomy: randomized controlled trial
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84894112567&partnerID=40&md5=6d56e998bac864042f38317be9d6343c
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24585907
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1678
_version_ 1681419715240525824