Comparison of Oral versus Intravenous Ramosetron in Prevention of Acute Cisplatin-Induced Emesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective: To compare the antiemetic efficacy of a single oral versus intravenous (IV) ramosetron, a new class of selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, in gynecologic cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. Method: Between February 2003 and July 2003, 109 patients with gynecologic cancer sche...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tantipalakorn C., Thienthong H., Suprasert P., Eamtang S., Pautad N., Srisomboon J., Pantusart A., Saereesongkhun C., Sutthichat A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-1842761441&partnerID=40&md5=b9f7e6fc995d0a4c2056ce5f1a70e25e
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15061293
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1722
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-1722
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-17222014-08-30T02:00:00Z Comparison of Oral versus Intravenous Ramosetron in Prevention of Acute Cisplatin-Induced Emesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Tantipalakorn C. Thienthong H. Suprasert P. Eamtang S. Pautad N. Srisomboon J. Pantusart A. Saereesongkhun C. Sutthichat A. Objective: To compare the antiemetic efficacy of a single oral versus intravenous (IV) ramosetron, a new class of selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, in gynecologic cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. Method: Between February 2003 and July 2003, 109 patients with gynecologic cancer scheduled to receive single agent cisplatin chemotherapy at a dose of 75 mg/m2 were randomized to receive either 0.2 mg oral (51 cases) or 0. 3 mg IV (58 cases) ramosetron 1 h and 30 min respectively before chemotherapy. Patients were evaluated for 24 h after chemotherapy. The number of nausea and vomiting including adverse events were recorded every 6 h. Results: 51 and 58 patients received oral and IV ramosetron respectively. Both groups were similar regarding age, performance status, body mass index and diagnosis of gynecologic cancer. 95 per cent of cases were cervical cancer. Antiemetic effect was significantly higher in the oral group when compared with the IV group during the first 6 hours and during the period of 18 to 24 hours after administration of cisplatin chemotherapy. Overall in 24 h, patients receiving oral ramosetron experienced no emesis slightly higher than that of the IV group (55% and 36% respectively, p = 0.05). Adverse events were mild and transient and were not significantly different in both groups, except tiredness which was more frequent in the IV group. Conclusion: Oral ramosetron at a dosage of 0.2 mg is as effective as 0.3 mg of intravenous ramosetron in prevention of acute emesis in patients receiving 75 mg/m2 of cisplatin chemotherapy. 2014-08-30T02:00:00Z 2014-08-30T02:00:00Z 2004 Article 01252208 15061293 JMTHB http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-1842761441&partnerID=40&md5=b9f7e6fc995d0a4c2056ce5f1a70e25e http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15061293 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1722 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Objective: To compare the antiemetic efficacy of a single oral versus intravenous (IV) ramosetron, a new class of selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, in gynecologic cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. Method: Between February 2003 and July 2003, 109 patients with gynecologic cancer scheduled to receive single agent cisplatin chemotherapy at a dose of 75 mg/m2 were randomized to receive either 0.2 mg oral (51 cases) or 0. 3 mg IV (58 cases) ramosetron 1 h and 30 min respectively before chemotherapy. Patients were evaluated for 24 h after chemotherapy. The number of nausea and vomiting including adverse events were recorded every 6 h. Results: 51 and 58 patients received oral and IV ramosetron respectively. Both groups were similar regarding age, performance status, body mass index and diagnosis of gynecologic cancer. 95 per cent of cases were cervical cancer. Antiemetic effect was significantly higher in the oral group when compared with the IV group during the first 6 hours and during the period of 18 to 24 hours after administration of cisplatin chemotherapy. Overall in 24 h, patients receiving oral ramosetron experienced no emesis slightly higher than that of the IV group (55% and 36% respectively, p = 0.05). Adverse events were mild and transient and were not significantly different in both groups, except tiredness which was more frequent in the IV group. Conclusion: Oral ramosetron at a dosage of 0.2 mg is as effective as 0.3 mg of intravenous ramosetron in prevention of acute emesis in patients receiving 75 mg/m2 of cisplatin chemotherapy.
format Article
author Tantipalakorn C.
Thienthong H.
Suprasert P.
Eamtang S.
Pautad N.
Srisomboon J.
Pantusart A.
Saereesongkhun C.
Sutthichat A.
spellingShingle Tantipalakorn C.
Thienthong H.
Suprasert P.
Eamtang S.
Pautad N.
Srisomboon J.
Pantusart A.
Saereesongkhun C.
Sutthichat A.
Comparison of Oral versus Intravenous Ramosetron in Prevention of Acute Cisplatin-Induced Emesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
author_facet Tantipalakorn C.
Thienthong H.
Suprasert P.
Eamtang S.
Pautad N.
Srisomboon J.
Pantusart A.
Saereesongkhun C.
Sutthichat A.
author_sort Tantipalakorn C.
title Comparison of Oral versus Intravenous Ramosetron in Prevention of Acute Cisplatin-Induced Emesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparison of Oral versus Intravenous Ramosetron in Prevention of Acute Cisplatin-Induced Emesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparison of Oral versus Intravenous Ramosetron in Prevention of Acute Cisplatin-Induced Emesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Oral versus Intravenous Ramosetron in Prevention of Acute Cisplatin-Induced Emesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Oral versus Intravenous Ramosetron in Prevention of Acute Cisplatin-Induced Emesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparison of oral versus intravenous ramosetron in prevention of acute cisplatin-induced emesis: a randomized controlled trial
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-1842761441&partnerID=40&md5=b9f7e6fc995d0a4c2056ce5f1a70e25e
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15061293
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1722
_version_ 1681419723497013248