Comparative study of bulky stage IB and IIA cervical cancer patients treated by radical hysterectomy with and without neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Long-term follow-up

• Main Authors: Manusirivithaya S., Chareoniam V., Pantusart A., Isariyodom P., Srisomboon J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: 2014
• Online Access: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0035735387&partnerID=40&md5=337194252f70ab541d62067687461caf; http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1839
• Institution: Chiang Mai University

One hundred and ninety patients with bulky (> 3 cm) stage IB and IIA cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy between 1991 and 1994 at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital were reviewed to determine whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with MVAC (Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Adriamycin, Cisplatin) improved survival. There were 42 patients treated with pre-operative NAC (MVAC 1-3 courses) and 148 patients treated by primary surgery (PS). In the NAC group, the overall response rate from MVAC was 88.1 per cent with 31.0 per cent having complete clinical response and 7.1 per cent with complete pathological response. Pelvic lymph node metastasis was not significantly different between the NAC group (16.7%) and the PS group (18.2%). At a median follow-up of 64.5 months, 19.0 per cent in the NAC group and 18.2 per cent in the PS group had tumor recurrence. The 5-year progression free and overall survival was 80.8 per cent and 92.0 per cent respectively for the NAC group which was not significantly different from 80.2 per cent and 92.9 per cent respectively in the PS group. In conclusion, although NAC can decrease the tumor size and produce a high response rate, it does not improve survival in bulky stage IB and IIA cervical cancer patients.