Endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents

Background: Ureteral stents are in common use in urologic practice. Even though the stent is a valuable urological tool, its use has two widely encountered complications, namely, stent encrustation and stone formation. These complications are difficult to manage; but endourologic surgery, which is m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lojanapiwat B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-31544453902&partnerID=40&md5=34d20ad70b4b35017c01fd8a0bfeb8fa
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16536105
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1852
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-1852
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-18522014-08-30T02:00:11Z Endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents Lojanapiwat B. Background: Ureteral stents are in common use in urologic practice. Even though the stent is a valuable urological tool, its use has two widely encountered complications, namely, stent encrustation and stone formation. These complications are difficult to manage; but endourologic surgery, which is minimally invasive, has become the first choice in the treatment for encrustation and stone formation. Material and Method: Eight patients with severely encrusted ureteral stents were treated by endourologic techniques. One patient had severe encrustation at all sites of the stent and was treated by percutaneuos nephrolithotomy, ureteroscopy with intracorporeal lithotripsy and cystolitholapaxy. Five patients with severe encrustation at both ends of the stent were treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy and cystolitholapaxy(4 cases) and with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and cystolitholapaxy. The last two patients with severely encrusted ureteral stents at the bladder end were treated with percutaneous cystolithotomy with intracorporeal lithotripsy and by optical lithotrite, respectively. Results: All cases were stone free and stent free in one session without complication. The average approaches were 1.9 (range 1-3). All stents were removed intact and no subsequent stent was required following the removal of the problematic stent. Conclusion: Endourologic surgery which is minimally invasive surgery, is the first choice of treatment for the management of severely encrusted ureteral stents with good results in one session without complications and no subsequent stent is necessary. The authors recommend removing the stent as soon as possible or change the new stent every 3 months for decreasing the incidence of these complications. 2014-08-30T02:00:11Z 2014-08-30T02:00:11Z 2005 Article 01252208 16536105 JMTHB http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-31544453902&partnerID=40&md5=34d20ad70b4b35017c01fd8a0bfeb8fa http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16536105 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1852 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Background: Ureteral stents are in common use in urologic practice. Even though the stent is a valuable urological tool, its use has two widely encountered complications, namely, stent encrustation and stone formation. These complications are difficult to manage; but endourologic surgery, which is minimally invasive, has become the first choice in the treatment for encrustation and stone formation. Material and Method: Eight patients with severely encrusted ureteral stents were treated by endourologic techniques. One patient had severe encrustation at all sites of the stent and was treated by percutaneuos nephrolithotomy, ureteroscopy with intracorporeal lithotripsy and cystolitholapaxy. Five patients with severe encrustation at both ends of the stent were treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy and cystolitholapaxy(4 cases) and with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and cystolitholapaxy. The last two patients with severely encrusted ureteral stents at the bladder end were treated with percutaneous cystolithotomy with intracorporeal lithotripsy and by optical lithotrite, respectively. Results: All cases were stone free and stent free in one session without complication. The average approaches were 1.9 (range 1-3). All stents were removed intact and no subsequent stent was required following the removal of the problematic stent. Conclusion: Endourologic surgery which is minimally invasive surgery, is the first choice of treatment for the management of severely encrusted ureteral stents with good results in one session without complications and no subsequent stent is necessary. The authors recommend removing the stent as soon as possible or change the new stent every 3 months for decreasing the incidence of these complications.
format Article
author Lojanapiwat B.
spellingShingle Lojanapiwat B.
Endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents
author_facet Lojanapiwat B.
author_sort Lojanapiwat B.
title Endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents
title_short Endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents
title_full Endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents
title_fullStr Endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents
title_full_unstemmed Endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents
title_sort endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-31544453902&partnerID=40&md5=34d20ad70b4b35017c01fd8a0bfeb8fa
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16536105
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1852
_version_ 1681419747933028352