Risk for radical hysterectomy failure

During the period from July 1983 to December 1996, 685 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy as their primary treatment for cervical cancer and had optimal follow-up for at least three years were analyzed. Fifty seven patients (8.3%) had pelvic nodes metastasis and received postoperative whole...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manusirivithaya S., Charoeniam V., Isariyodom P., Pantusart A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0035376573&partnerID=40&md5=b28a0baf5c39b09977f034872297b963
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1870
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
Description
Summary:During the period from July 1983 to December 1996, 685 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy as their primary treatment for cervical cancer and had optimal follow-up for at least three years were analyzed. Fifty seven patients (8.3%) had pelvic nodes metastasis and received postoperative whole pelvic radiation. Tumor recurrence was noted in 97 cases (14.2%). Nodal metastasis is the most significant prognostic factor for tumor recurrence. Patients with nodal metastasis had 42.1 per cent risk of recurrence compared to 11.6 per cent in those without nodal metastasis. Furthermore; risk of recurrence significantly increased if more than 1 node was involved. Other factors associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrence in multivariate analysis were tumor histology and clinical stage. Patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma and clinical stage IIa had disease recurrence in 24.4 per cent and 30.3 per cent compared to only 11.7 per cent in squamous and 13.3 per cent in stage Ib. Tumor grade is the significant prognostic factor only in adenocarcinoma cell type but not in squamous cell type.