An analysis of the drug error problem in the Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study)

Objectives: To analyze the problem of drug error related to anesthesia in Thailand including nature, contributing factors and preventive strategies. Material and Method: We prospectively recorded anesthesia-related drug error incidents for 18 months in 20 studied hospitals in Thailand. Types of erro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hintong T., Chau-In W., Thienthong S., Nakcharoenwaree S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-31644436315&partnerID=40&md5=452640d2b7959bf38941f4606ad26604
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16858991
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1881
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-1881
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-18812014-08-30T02:00:13Z An analysis of the drug error problem in the Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study) Hintong T. Chau-In W. Thienthong S. Nakcharoenwaree S. Objectives: To analyze the problem of drug error related to anesthesia in Thailand including nature, contributing factors and preventive strategies. Material and Method: We prospectively recorded anesthesia-related drug error incidents for 18 months in 20 studied hospitals in Thailand. Types of errors and their outcomes were recorded. All data were analyzed to identify contributing factors and preventive strategies. Results: Forty-one drug error incidents were reported in 40 out of 202,699 anesthetized cases or 1: 4,943 in this study. The most common type of error was wrong drug (20 incidents; 48.8%). No relationship between anesthetic techniques and the incidents except for a combined general and epidural technique. The errors were most commonly occurred during induction of anesthesia(26 out of 41; 63.4%) and muscle relaxants were most commonly involved(13 out of 41; 31.7%). The majority of incidents (26 out of 41; 63.4%) caused no adverse effect. However 14 incidents (34.1%) caused transient mild to severe physiological effects, of which 13 had complete recovery but one died. Haste and lack of recheck were two common contributing factors which were minimized by high awareness and double check prior to drug administration. Main strategies suggested to prevent the incidents included specific guideline development whereas the incidents did not effectively decrease by increasing of manpower. Conclusion: The incidence of drug error in our study was 1: 4,943. It can cause morbidity and mortality during anesthesia. Practitioners should be aware of these potential incidents and strictly follow the guideline for drug administration. 2014-08-30T02:00:13Z 2014-08-30T02:00:13Z 2005 Article 01252208 16858991 JMTHB http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-31644436315&partnerID=40&md5=452640d2b7959bf38941f4606ad26604 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16858991 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1881 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Objectives: To analyze the problem of drug error related to anesthesia in Thailand including nature, contributing factors and preventive strategies. Material and Method: We prospectively recorded anesthesia-related drug error incidents for 18 months in 20 studied hospitals in Thailand. Types of errors and their outcomes were recorded. All data were analyzed to identify contributing factors and preventive strategies. Results: Forty-one drug error incidents were reported in 40 out of 202,699 anesthetized cases or 1: 4,943 in this study. The most common type of error was wrong drug (20 incidents; 48.8%). No relationship between anesthetic techniques and the incidents except for a combined general and epidural technique. The errors were most commonly occurred during induction of anesthesia(26 out of 41; 63.4%) and muscle relaxants were most commonly involved(13 out of 41; 31.7%). The majority of incidents (26 out of 41; 63.4%) caused no adverse effect. However 14 incidents (34.1%) caused transient mild to severe physiological effects, of which 13 had complete recovery but one died. Haste and lack of recheck were two common contributing factors which were minimized by high awareness and double check prior to drug administration. Main strategies suggested to prevent the incidents included specific guideline development whereas the incidents did not effectively decrease by increasing of manpower. Conclusion: The incidence of drug error in our study was 1: 4,943. It can cause morbidity and mortality during anesthesia. Practitioners should be aware of these potential incidents and strictly follow the guideline for drug administration.
format Article
author Hintong T.
Chau-In W.
Thienthong S.
Nakcharoenwaree S.
spellingShingle Hintong T.
Chau-In W.
Thienthong S.
Nakcharoenwaree S.
An analysis of the drug error problem in the Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study)
author_facet Hintong T.
Chau-In W.
Thienthong S.
Nakcharoenwaree S.
author_sort Hintong T.
title An analysis of the drug error problem in the Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study)
title_short An analysis of the drug error problem in the Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study)
title_full An analysis of the drug error problem in the Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study)
title_fullStr An analysis of the drug error problem in the Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study)
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of the drug error problem in the Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study)
title_sort analysis of the drug error problem in the thai anesthesia incidents study (thai study)
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-31644436315&partnerID=40&md5=452640d2b7959bf38941f4606ad26604
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16858991
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1881
_version_ 1681419753320611840