Left retroperitoneal versus midline transperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) repair

Objective: The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the left retroperitoneal approach (RPA) with the midline transperitoneal approach (TPA) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) repair with operative details, postoperative complications, and total cost comparision....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laohapensang K., Rerkasem K., Chotirosniramit N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-23044479680&partnerID=40&md5=d4ea03fe9e9626b8cff47f7aedc83248
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16149675
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1917
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-1917
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-19172014-08-30T02:00:15Z Left retroperitoneal versus midline transperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) repair Laohapensang K. Rerkasem K. Chotirosniramit N. Objective: The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the left retroperitoneal approach (RPA) with the midline transperitoneal approach (TPA) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) repair with operative details, postoperative complications, and total cost comparision. Material and Method: Between January 2000 and December 2003,36 patients undergoing elective surgery for infrarenal AAAs were included in the prospective comparison of transperitoneal approach (TPA) with retroperitoneal approach (RPA). Thirty-six patients were analyzed, with 18 in group 2 (TPA) and 18 in group I (PRA). There was no significant differences between the groups in patient demographics. (p value > 0.05) Results: There was no significant differences in the aortic cross clamp time, operative time, estimated blood loss and intraoperative blood transfusion between the two groups (p value > 0.05); however, significantly more intraoperative fluid needs and bowel function onset had a statistically longer return in group II (TPA) than in group I (RPA). Statistically reduction in postoperative ileus (> 4 days) and total length of hospital stay was observed in group I (RPA) (p value < 0.05). Postoperative cardiopulmonary complications were statistically significantly more increased in group II (TPA) than in group I (RPA). Wound complications were more in group I (RPA) (1 hematoma, 4 abdominal wall hernia, and 4 chronic wound pain) than in group II (TPA) (2 chronic wound pain). Total cost payment was not significantly different in both groups. Conclusion: The left retroperitoneal approach for infrarenal AAAs repair, with fewer cardiopulmonary complications and shorter hospital stay has more unsatisfactory postoperative wound complications than the midline transperitoneal approach. 2014-08-30T02:00:15Z 2014-08-30T02:00:15Z 2005 Article 01252208 16149675 JMTHB http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-23044479680&partnerID=40&md5=d4ea03fe9e9626b8cff47f7aedc83248 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16149675 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1917 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Objective: The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the left retroperitoneal approach (RPA) with the midline transperitoneal approach (TPA) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) repair with operative details, postoperative complications, and total cost comparision. Material and Method: Between January 2000 and December 2003,36 patients undergoing elective surgery for infrarenal AAAs were included in the prospective comparison of transperitoneal approach (TPA) with retroperitoneal approach (RPA). Thirty-six patients were analyzed, with 18 in group 2 (TPA) and 18 in group I (PRA). There was no significant differences between the groups in patient demographics. (p value > 0.05) Results: There was no significant differences in the aortic cross clamp time, operative time, estimated blood loss and intraoperative blood transfusion between the two groups (p value > 0.05); however, significantly more intraoperative fluid needs and bowel function onset had a statistically longer return in group II (TPA) than in group I (RPA). Statistically reduction in postoperative ileus (> 4 days) and total length of hospital stay was observed in group I (RPA) (p value < 0.05). Postoperative cardiopulmonary complications were statistically significantly more increased in group II (TPA) than in group I (RPA). Wound complications were more in group I (RPA) (1 hematoma, 4 abdominal wall hernia, and 4 chronic wound pain) than in group II (TPA) (2 chronic wound pain). Total cost payment was not significantly different in both groups. Conclusion: The left retroperitoneal approach for infrarenal AAAs repair, with fewer cardiopulmonary complications and shorter hospital stay has more unsatisfactory postoperative wound complications than the midline transperitoneal approach.
format Article
author Laohapensang K.
Rerkasem K.
Chotirosniramit N.
spellingShingle Laohapensang K.
Rerkasem K.
Chotirosniramit N.
Left retroperitoneal versus midline transperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) repair
author_facet Laohapensang K.
Rerkasem K.
Chotirosniramit N.
author_sort Laohapensang K.
title Left retroperitoneal versus midline transperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) repair
title_short Left retroperitoneal versus midline transperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) repair
title_full Left retroperitoneal versus midline transperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) repair
title_fullStr Left retroperitoneal versus midline transperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) repair
title_full_unstemmed Left retroperitoneal versus midline transperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) repair
title_sort left retroperitoneal versus midline transperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms (aaas) repair
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-23044479680&partnerID=40&md5=d4ea03fe9e9626b8cff47f7aedc83248
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16149675
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1917
_version_ 1681419760014721024