A comparison of labor induction by oral and vaginal misoprostol
[No abstract available]
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Pongsatha S., Vijittrawiwat A., Tongsong T. |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2014
|
Online Access: | http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-13844267838&partnerID=40&md5=e5d17005d400b8858ea694f03f9b5840 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15694090 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/1951 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Chiang Mai University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
A comparison of labor induction by oral and vaginal misoprostol
by: S. Pongsatha, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: A randomized controlled trial
by: Nawarat Paungmora, et al.
Published: (2018) -
A comparison of 100 microg oral misoprostol every 3 hours and 6 hours for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial
by: Pongsatha S., et al.
Published: (2014) -
A comparison of 100 μg oral misoprostol every 3 hours and 6 hours for labor induction: A randomized controlled trial
by: Pongsatha S., et al.
Published: (2014) -
A comparison between 50 mcg oral misoprostol every 4 hours and 6 hours for labor induction: A prospective randomized controlled trial
by: Pongsatha S., et al.
Published: (2014)