The rapid biophysical profile for early intrapartum fetal well-being assessment

Objective: To determine the efficacy of the rapid biophysical profile (rBPP), which uses sound-provoked, ultrasonographically detected fetal movement and amniotic fluid index, for early intrapartum fetal well-being assessment and prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes. Methods: Rapid BPP was perfo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tongprasert F., Jinpala S., Srisupandit K., Tongsong T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33748136481&partnerID=40&md5=4ceb371e27f112db75c57d6c37ed52a5
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16860803
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2034
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-2034
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-20342014-08-30T02:00:24Z The rapid biophysical profile for early intrapartum fetal well-being assessment Tongprasert F. Jinpala S. Srisupandit K. Tongsong T. Objective: To determine the efficacy of the rapid biophysical profile (rBPP), which uses sound-provoked, ultrasonographically detected fetal movement and amniotic fluid index, for early intrapartum fetal well-being assessment and prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes. Methods: Rapid BPP was performed in 330 women admitted to the labor unit of Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand, from January 2005 to July 2005. Those who were delivered later than 24 h after the rBPP, or who required emergency cesarean section because of placenta previa, abruptio placentae or prolapsed cord were to be excluded. Perinatal outcomes were prospectively assessed and recorded for subsequent analysis. The predicting accuracy of rBPP was calculated according to poor outcomes, which included fetal distress, low Apgar score, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and perinatal death. Results: Among the 330 pregnancies, there were 6 adverse perinatal outcomes (1.8%). The rBPP had a sensitivity of 50.0%, a specificity of 99.07%, a positive predictive value of 50.0%, a negative predictive value of 99.07% and an accuracy of 98.18%. Conclusion: With its simplicity, low cost and high specificity but its low sensitivity and low negative predictive value, the rBPP may be used as a back-up test to confirm fetal well-being during the early intrapartum period in developing countries. © 2006 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2014-08-30T02:00:24Z 2014-08-30T02:00:24Z 2006 Article 00207292 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.05.015 16860803 IJGOA http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33748136481&partnerID=40&md5=4ceb371e27f112db75c57d6c37ed52a5 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16860803 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2034 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Objective: To determine the efficacy of the rapid biophysical profile (rBPP), which uses sound-provoked, ultrasonographically detected fetal movement and amniotic fluid index, for early intrapartum fetal well-being assessment and prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes. Methods: Rapid BPP was performed in 330 women admitted to the labor unit of Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand, from January 2005 to July 2005. Those who were delivered later than 24 h after the rBPP, or who required emergency cesarean section because of placenta previa, abruptio placentae or prolapsed cord were to be excluded. Perinatal outcomes were prospectively assessed and recorded for subsequent analysis. The predicting accuracy of rBPP was calculated according to poor outcomes, which included fetal distress, low Apgar score, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and perinatal death. Results: Among the 330 pregnancies, there were 6 adverse perinatal outcomes (1.8%). The rBPP had a sensitivity of 50.0%, a specificity of 99.07%, a positive predictive value of 50.0%, a negative predictive value of 99.07% and an accuracy of 98.18%. Conclusion: With its simplicity, low cost and high specificity but its low sensitivity and low negative predictive value, the rBPP may be used as a back-up test to confirm fetal well-being during the early intrapartum period in developing countries. © 2006 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
format Article
author Tongprasert F.
Jinpala S.
Srisupandit K.
Tongsong T.
spellingShingle Tongprasert F.
Jinpala S.
Srisupandit K.
Tongsong T.
The rapid biophysical profile for early intrapartum fetal well-being assessment
author_facet Tongprasert F.
Jinpala S.
Srisupandit K.
Tongsong T.
author_sort Tongprasert F.
title The rapid biophysical profile for early intrapartum fetal well-being assessment
title_short The rapid biophysical profile for early intrapartum fetal well-being assessment
title_full The rapid biophysical profile for early intrapartum fetal well-being assessment
title_fullStr The rapid biophysical profile for early intrapartum fetal well-being assessment
title_full_unstemmed The rapid biophysical profile for early intrapartum fetal well-being assessment
title_sort rapid biophysical profile for early intrapartum fetal well-being assessment
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33748136481&partnerID=40&md5=4ceb371e27f112db75c57d6c37ed52a5
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16860803
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2034
_version_ 1681419782322126848