Analysis of paranasal sinus development and anatomical variations: A CT genetic study in twins

Objective: To determine if anatomical variations in the paranasal sinuses of twins are the result of genetic or environmental influences. Study design: A prospective, observational study. Setting: An academic hospital in Brussels, Belgium. Participants: Twenty-five volunteer twins (17 identical twin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chaiyasate S., Baron I., Clement P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-34147096404&partnerID=40&md5=a4cd5ccccce4bfb5c0c6c648c689420d
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17403223
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2237
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-2237
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-22372014-08-30T02:00:37Z Analysis of paranasal sinus development and anatomical variations: A CT genetic study in twins Chaiyasate S. Baron I. Clement P. Objective: To determine if anatomical variations in the paranasal sinuses of twins are the result of genetic or environmental influences. Study design: A prospective, observational study. Setting: An academic hospital in Brussels, Belgium. Participants: Twenty-five volunteer twins (17 identical twins and eight non-identical twins). Of the identical twins, six were both female and 11 both male. The mean age was 40.6 years (18-49). Of the non-identical twins, one pair was female and seven were male. The mean age was 39.6 years (25-48). Main outcome measures: The CT-scan similarity in anatomical structures (frontal cells, agger nasi cells, concha bullosa, infraorbital cells and changes in the shape of the lamina orbitalis), and the intranasal and paranasal sinus morphology was compared between the twins. Results: Among the studied variables, there was no statistically significant difference between the two twin groups (Fisher's exact test, P > 0.05). Regarding combine-studied parameters, there were no identical CT scans in the twins. However, a tendency of non-genetic influence existed in the development of frontal cell type III and IV, and infraorbital cells, as well as a liability of genetic influence in the presence of concha bullosa. Conclusion: In this study, the differences in anatomical structure of the paranasal sinuses between identical and non-identical twin pairs were not statistically significant. This indicates that environmental factors are more significant than genetic ones in the development of anatomical variations in paranasal sinus anatomy. © 2007 The Authors. 2014-08-30T02:00:37Z 2014-08-30T02:00:37Z 2007 Article 17494478 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2007.01404.x 17403223 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-34147096404&partnerID=40&md5=a4cd5ccccce4bfb5c0c6c648c689420d http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17403223 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2237 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Objective: To determine if anatomical variations in the paranasal sinuses of twins are the result of genetic or environmental influences. Study design: A prospective, observational study. Setting: An academic hospital in Brussels, Belgium. Participants: Twenty-five volunteer twins (17 identical twins and eight non-identical twins). Of the identical twins, six were both female and 11 both male. The mean age was 40.6 years (18-49). Of the non-identical twins, one pair was female and seven were male. The mean age was 39.6 years (25-48). Main outcome measures: The CT-scan similarity in anatomical structures (frontal cells, agger nasi cells, concha bullosa, infraorbital cells and changes in the shape of the lamina orbitalis), and the intranasal and paranasal sinus morphology was compared between the twins. Results: Among the studied variables, there was no statistically significant difference between the two twin groups (Fisher's exact test, P > 0.05). Regarding combine-studied parameters, there were no identical CT scans in the twins. However, a tendency of non-genetic influence existed in the development of frontal cell type III and IV, and infraorbital cells, as well as a liability of genetic influence in the presence of concha bullosa. Conclusion: In this study, the differences in anatomical structure of the paranasal sinuses between identical and non-identical twin pairs were not statistically significant. This indicates that environmental factors are more significant than genetic ones in the development of anatomical variations in paranasal sinus anatomy. © 2007 The Authors.
format Article
author Chaiyasate S.
Baron I.
Clement P.
spellingShingle Chaiyasate S.
Baron I.
Clement P.
Analysis of paranasal sinus development and anatomical variations: A CT genetic study in twins
author_facet Chaiyasate S.
Baron I.
Clement P.
author_sort Chaiyasate S.
title Analysis of paranasal sinus development and anatomical variations: A CT genetic study in twins
title_short Analysis of paranasal sinus development and anatomical variations: A CT genetic study in twins
title_full Analysis of paranasal sinus development and anatomical variations: A CT genetic study in twins
title_fullStr Analysis of paranasal sinus development and anatomical variations: A CT genetic study in twins
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of paranasal sinus development and anatomical variations: A CT genetic study in twins
title_sort analysis of paranasal sinus development and anatomical variations: a ct genetic study in twins
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-34147096404&partnerID=40&md5=a4cd5ccccce4bfb5c0c6c648c689420d
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17403223
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2237
_version_ 1681419820880363520