Fine needle aspiration for evaluation of breast masses

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Fine needle aspiration has been used for many years as a diagnostic tool for breast lesions, with high sensitivity and specificity. There is controversy as to whether this technique should be replaced by other diagnostic procedures such as core biopsy. This review aims to re-evalu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chaiwun B., Thorner P.
Format: Review
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33846211753&partnerID=40&md5=51a5f438cfc66d83cf2ca3627d7e0621
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17218852
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2279
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-2279
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-22792014-08-30T02:00:40Z Fine needle aspiration for evaluation of breast masses Chaiwun B. Thorner P. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Fine needle aspiration has been used for many years as a diagnostic tool for breast lesions, with high sensitivity and specificity. There is controversy as to whether this technique should be replaced by other diagnostic procedures such as core biopsy. This review aims to re-evaluate the usefulness of breast fine needle aspiration. RECENT FINDINGS: During the past 10 years many institutions have replaced fine needle aspiration by core biopsy and related techniques such as vacuum-assisted core biopsy and advanced breast biopsy instrument action. Other institutions continue to use fine needle aspiration as a first line of investigation for breast lesions. This technique is especially useful in radiologically benign lesions and when combined with image guidance. The use of the 'triple test' (combined cytologic, clinical and radiologic findings) decreases false-negative and false-positive results. SUMMARY: Fine needle aspiration continues to be an acceptable and reliable procedure for the preoperative diagnosis of breast lesions, particularly in developing countries, and when used as part of the 'triple test'. Accurate diagnosis requires experience in both aspiration technique and specimen interpretation. Clinicians should be mindful of the limitations of the technique. The choice between fine needle aspiration and core biopsy should be individualized for the patient. © 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 2014-08-30T02:00:40Z 2014-08-30T02:00:40Z 2007 Review 1040872X 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328011f9ae 17218852 COOGE http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33846211753&partnerID=40&md5=51a5f438cfc66d83cf2ca3627d7e0621 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17218852 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2279 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Fine needle aspiration has been used for many years as a diagnostic tool for breast lesions, with high sensitivity and specificity. There is controversy as to whether this technique should be replaced by other diagnostic procedures such as core biopsy. This review aims to re-evaluate the usefulness of breast fine needle aspiration. RECENT FINDINGS: During the past 10 years many institutions have replaced fine needle aspiration by core biopsy and related techniques such as vacuum-assisted core biopsy and advanced breast biopsy instrument action. Other institutions continue to use fine needle aspiration as a first line of investigation for breast lesions. This technique is especially useful in radiologically benign lesions and when combined with image guidance. The use of the 'triple test' (combined cytologic, clinical and radiologic findings) decreases false-negative and false-positive results. SUMMARY: Fine needle aspiration continues to be an acceptable and reliable procedure for the preoperative diagnosis of breast lesions, particularly in developing countries, and when used as part of the 'triple test'. Accurate diagnosis requires experience in both aspiration technique and specimen interpretation. Clinicians should be mindful of the limitations of the technique. The choice between fine needle aspiration and core biopsy should be individualized for the patient. © 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
format Review
author Chaiwun B.
Thorner P.
spellingShingle Chaiwun B.
Thorner P.
Fine needle aspiration for evaluation of breast masses
author_facet Chaiwun B.
Thorner P.
author_sort Chaiwun B.
title Fine needle aspiration for evaluation of breast masses
title_short Fine needle aspiration for evaluation of breast masses
title_full Fine needle aspiration for evaluation of breast masses
title_fullStr Fine needle aspiration for evaluation of breast masses
title_full_unstemmed Fine needle aspiration for evaluation of breast masses
title_sort fine needle aspiration for evaluation of breast masses
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33846211753&partnerID=40&md5=51a5f438cfc66d83cf2ca3627d7e0621
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17218852
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2279
_version_ 1681419828880998400