Comparison of four reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction procedures for the detection of dengue virus in clinical specimens
The sensitivity of dengue virus identification by mosquito inoculation and four reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) procedures (Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 45 (1991) 418 (H); J. Clin. Microbiol. 29 (1991) 2107 (M); J. Clin. Microbiol. 30 (1992) 545 (L); and Southeast Asian J. Trop. M...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2014
|
Online Access: | http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-18644383634&partnerID=40&md5=f03fa068a13f3f85000aaafca942acc0 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2417 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Chiang Mai University |
Language: | English |
id |
th-cmuir.6653943832-2417 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-cmuir.6653943832-24172014-08-30T02:00:49Z Comparison of four reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction procedures for the detection of dengue virus in clinical specimens Raengsakulrach B. Nisalak A. Maneekarn N. Yenchitsomanus P.-T. Limsomwong C. Jairungsri A. Thirawuth V. Green S. Kalayanarooj S. Suntayakorn S. Sittisombut N. Malasit P. Vaughn D.W. The sensitivity of dengue virus identification by mosquito inoculation and four reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) procedures (Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 45 (1991) 418 (H); J. Clin. Microbiol. 29 (1991) 2107 (M); J. Clin. Microbiol. 30 (1992) 545 (L); and Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 27 (1996) 228 (Y)) were compared using coded clinical specimens derived from areas in Thailand where all four dengue serotypes circulate. The sensitivity of virus detection in serologically confirmed dengue cases was 54, 52, 60, 79, and 80% for mosquito inoculation, procedures H, M, L and Y, respectively. In comparison to clinical specimens which yielded virus isolates by mosquito inoculation, there was relatively low sensitivity in detecting each of the four dengue serotypes by PCR: procedure H-dengue 4 (25%), procedure M-dengue 3 (73%), procedure L-dengue 1 (70%), and procedure Y-dengue 1 (79%). Dengue virus was detectable by RT-PCR for more days of illness and in the presence of dengue-specific antibody when compared to virus isolated in mosquitoes. Procedures L and Y were more sensitive than mosquito inoculation or procedures H and M in detecting all four dengue serotypes in clinical specimens and may be the RT-PCR methods of choice for virus surveillance or research use. © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. 2014-08-30T02:00:49Z 2014-08-30T02:00:49Z 2002 Article 01660934 10.1016/S0166-0934(02)00104-0 12270655 JVMED http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-18644383634&partnerID=40&md5=f03fa068a13f3f85000aaafca942acc0 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2417 English |
institution |
Chiang Mai University |
building |
Chiang Mai University Library |
country |
Thailand |
collection |
CMU Intellectual Repository |
language |
English |
description |
The sensitivity of dengue virus identification by mosquito inoculation and four reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) procedures (Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 45 (1991) 418 (H); J. Clin. Microbiol. 29 (1991) 2107 (M); J. Clin. Microbiol. 30 (1992) 545 (L); and Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 27 (1996) 228 (Y)) were compared using coded clinical specimens derived from areas in Thailand where all four dengue serotypes circulate. The sensitivity of virus detection in serologically confirmed dengue cases was 54, 52, 60, 79, and 80% for mosquito inoculation, procedures H, M, L and Y, respectively. In comparison to clinical specimens which yielded virus isolates by mosquito inoculation, there was relatively low sensitivity in detecting each of the four dengue serotypes by PCR: procedure H-dengue 4 (25%), procedure M-dengue 3 (73%), procedure L-dengue 1 (70%), and procedure Y-dengue 1 (79%). Dengue virus was detectable by RT-PCR for more days of illness and in the presence of dengue-specific antibody when compared to virus isolated in mosquitoes. Procedures L and Y were more sensitive than mosquito inoculation or procedures H and M in detecting all four dengue serotypes in clinical specimens and may be the RT-PCR methods of choice for virus surveillance or research use. © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. |
format |
Article |
author |
Raengsakulrach B. Nisalak A. Maneekarn N. Yenchitsomanus P.-T. Limsomwong C. Jairungsri A. Thirawuth V. Green S. Kalayanarooj S. Suntayakorn S. Sittisombut N. Malasit P. Vaughn D.W. |
spellingShingle |
Raengsakulrach B. Nisalak A. Maneekarn N. Yenchitsomanus P.-T. Limsomwong C. Jairungsri A. Thirawuth V. Green S. Kalayanarooj S. Suntayakorn S. Sittisombut N. Malasit P. Vaughn D.W. Comparison of four reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction procedures for the detection of dengue virus in clinical specimens |
author_facet |
Raengsakulrach B. Nisalak A. Maneekarn N. Yenchitsomanus P.-T. Limsomwong C. Jairungsri A. Thirawuth V. Green S. Kalayanarooj S. Suntayakorn S. Sittisombut N. Malasit P. Vaughn D.W. |
author_sort |
Raengsakulrach B. |
title |
Comparison of four reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction procedures for the detection of dengue virus in clinical specimens |
title_short |
Comparison of four reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction procedures for the detection of dengue virus in clinical specimens |
title_full |
Comparison of four reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction procedures for the detection of dengue virus in clinical specimens |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of four reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction procedures for the detection of dengue virus in clinical specimens |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of four reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction procedures for the detection of dengue virus in clinical specimens |
title_sort |
comparison of four reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction procedures for the detection of dengue virus in clinical specimens |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-18644383634&partnerID=40&md5=f03fa068a13f3f85000aaafca942acc0 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2417 |
_version_ |
1681419854808088576 |