Novel low-cost assay for the monitoring of CD4 counts in HIV-infected individuals

Several CD4 lymphocyte enumeration methods have been developed to be used as alternatives to conventional flow cytometry. However, no consensus has been reached on which technique should be widely adopted. We introduce here a novel nonflow cytometric method, called CD4 Select, for enumeration of CD4...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Srithanaviboonchai K., Rungruengthanakit K., Nouanthong P., Pata S., Sirisanthana T., Kasinrerk W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-38649124930&partnerID=40&md5=12e36a5f394028cd5ca7518fb28f1a65
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18091046
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2479
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-2479
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-24792014-08-30T02:00:53Z Novel low-cost assay for the monitoring of CD4 counts in HIV-infected individuals Srithanaviboonchai K. Rungruengthanakit K. Nouanthong P. Pata S. Sirisanthana T. Kasinrerk W. Several CD4 lymphocyte enumeration methods have been developed to be used as alternatives to conventional flow cytometry. However, no consensus has been reached on which technique should be widely adopted. We introduce here a novel nonflow cytometric method, called CD4 Select, for enumeration of CD4 lymphocytes. Instead of using a flow cytometer, the method requires only an automatic hematoanalyzer (complete blood count [CBC] machine). The correlations of the percentage of CD4 lymphocytes and absolute CD4 counts with the CD4 Select method and standard flow cytometry were 0.932 and 0.922, respectively. The CD4 Select method yielded percentage of CD4 lymphocytes greater than flow cytometry by a mean of 0.06%, and the limits of agreement at 95% confidence interval (CI) were 9.46% to -9.56% using Bland-Altman analysis. The CD4 select method is cheap, valid, and simple enough to be conducted locally at small facilities. The method yields not only absolute CD4 lymphocytes, but also percentage of CD4 lymphocytes. The use of a hematoanalyzer also gives this method relatively high sample throughput and makes it less labor-intensive than other nonflow cytometric methods. © 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 2014-08-30T02:00:53Z 2014-08-30T02:00:53Z 2008 Article 15254135 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181624ab5 18091046 JJASF http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-38649124930&partnerID=40&md5=12e36a5f394028cd5ca7518fb28f1a65 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18091046 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2479 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Several CD4 lymphocyte enumeration methods have been developed to be used as alternatives to conventional flow cytometry. However, no consensus has been reached on which technique should be widely adopted. We introduce here a novel nonflow cytometric method, called CD4 Select, for enumeration of CD4 lymphocytes. Instead of using a flow cytometer, the method requires only an automatic hematoanalyzer (complete blood count [CBC] machine). The correlations of the percentage of CD4 lymphocytes and absolute CD4 counts with the CD4 Select method and standard flow cytometry were 0.932 and 0.922, respectively. The CD4 Select method yielded percentage of CD4 lymphocytes greater than flow cytometry by a mean of 0.06%, and the limits of agreement at 95% confidence interval (CI) were 9.46% to -9.56% using Bland-Altman analysis. The CD4 select method is cheap, valid, and simple enough to be conducted locally at small facilities. The method yields not only absolute CD4 lymphocytes, but also percentage of CD4 lymphocytes. The use of a hematoanalyzer also gives this method relatively high sample throughput and makes it less labor-intensive than other nonflow cytometric methods. © 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
format Article
author Srithanaviboonchai K.
Rungruengthanakit K.
Nouanthong P.
Pata S.
Sirisanthana T.
Kasinrerk W.
spellingShingle Srithanaviboonchai K.
Rungruengthanakit K.
Nouanthong P.
Pata S.
Sirisanthana T.
Kasinrerk W.
Novel low-cost assay for the monitoring of CD4 counts in HIV-infected individuals
author_facet Srithanaviboonchai K.
Rungruengthanakit K.
Nouanthong P.
Pata S.
Sirisanthana T.
Kasinrerk W.
author_sort Srithanaviboonchai K.
title Novel low-cost assay for the monitoring of CD4 counts in HIV-infected individuals
title_short Novel low-cost assay for the monitoring of CD4 counts in HIV-infected individuals
title_full Novel low-cost assay for the monitoring of CD4 counts in HIV-infected individuals
title_fullStr Novel low-cost assay for the monitoring of CD4 counts in HIV-infected individuals
title_full_unstemmed Novel low-cost assay for the monitoring of CD4 counts in HIV-infected individuals
title_sort novel low-cost assay for the monitoring of cd4 counts in hiv-infected individuals
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-38649124930&partnerID=40&md5=12e36a5f394028cd5ca7518fb28f1a65
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18091046
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2479
_version_ 1681419866534313984