Antibiotics for treating scrub typhus.
BACKGROUND: Scrub typhus is a bacterial disease in regions of Asia and the Pacific. Antibiotics (chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and doxycycline) have been used to treat the disease. Resistance to these antibiotics has been reported. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate antibiotic regimens for treating scrub typh...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Review |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2014
|
Online Access: | http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-18344418954&partnerID=40&md5=5f44423fe780e9585b7e46e39b594443 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2505 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Chiang Mai University |
Language: | English |
id |
th-cmuir.6653943832-2505 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-cmuir.6653943832-25052014-08-30T02:00:55Z Antibiotics for treating scrub typhus. Panpanich R. Garner P. BACKGROUND: Scrub typhus is a bacterial disease in regions of Asia and the Pacific. Antibiotics (chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and doxycycline) have been used to treat the disease. Resistance to these antibiotics has been reported. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate antibiotic regimens for treating scrub typhus. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group specialized trials register (March 2002); the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2002); MEDLINE (1966 to March 2002); EMBASE (1988 to January 2002); LILACS (2001, 40a Edition CD-ROM). We checked references and contacted authors for additional data. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi-randomized studies comparing antibiotic regimens in people diagnosed with scrub typhus. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer screened the search results; both reviewers assessed eligibility, quality and extracted data. We used Review Manager (Version 4.1), and expressed results as Relative Risk (binary) or weighted mean difference (continuous), with 95% confidence intervals. MAIN RESULTS: Four trials involving 451 adults met the inclusion criteria. One small study did not demonstrate a difference between tetracycline with chloramphenicol (participants afebrile after 48 hours, Relative Risk 1.00; 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 15.26). Two small trials did not show a difference between doxycycline and tetracycline (participants afebrile after 48 hours, Relative Risk 0.46; 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 1.75). One trial showed rifampicin to be more effective than doxycycline (for eliminating fever, Relative Risk 0.41; 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.77; no relapses in either group). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Limited data has not demonstrated a difference between tetracycline and doxycycline. Limited data suggest rifampicin is effective in areas where scrub typhus appears to respond poorly to standard anti-rickettsial drugs. 2014-08-30T02:00:55Z 2014-08-30T02:00:55Z 2002 Review 1469493X 12137646 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-18344418954&partnerID=40&md5=5f44423fe780e9585b7e46e39b594443 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2505 English |
institution |
Chiang Mai University |
building |
Chiang Mai University Library |
country |
Thailand |
collection |
CMU Intellectual Repository |
language |
English |
description |
BACKGROUND: Scrub typhus is a bacterial disease in regions of Asia and the Pacific. Antibiotics (chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and doxycycline) have been used to treat the disease. Resistance to these antibiotics has been reported. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate antibiotic regimens for treating scrub typhus. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group specialized trials register (March 2002); the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2002); MEDLINE (1966 to March 2002); EMBASE (1988 to January 2002); LILACS (2001, 40a Edition CD-ROM). We checked references and contacted authors for additional data. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi-randomized studies comparing antibiotic regimens in people diagnosed with scrub typhus. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer screened the search results; both reviewers assessed eligibility, quality and extracted data. We used Review Manager (Version 4.1), and expressed results as Relative Risk (binary) or weighted mean difference (continuous), with 95% confidence intervals. MAIN RESULTS: Four trials involving 451 adults met the inclusion criteria. One small study did not demonstrate a difference between tetracycline with chloramphenicol (participants afebrile after 48 hours, Relative Risk 1.00; 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 15.26). Two small trials did not show a difference between doxycycline and tetracycline (participants afebrile after 48 hours, Relative Risk 0.46; 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 1.75). One trial showed rifampicin to be more effective than doxycycline (for eliminating fever, Relative Risk 0.41; 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.77; no relapses in either group). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Limited data has not demonstrated a difference between tetracycline and doxycycline. Limited data suggest rifampicin is effective in areas where scrub typhus appears to respond poorly to standard anti-rickettsial drugs. |
format |
Review |
author |
Panpanich R. Garner P. |
spellingShingle |
Panpanich R. Garner P. Antibiotics for treating scrub typhus. |
author_facet |
Panpanich R. Garner P. |
author_sort |
Panpanich R. |
title |
Antibiotics for treating scrub typhus. |
title_short |
Antibiotics for treating scrub typhus. |
title_full |
Antibiotics for treating scrub typhus. |
title_fullStr |
Antibiotics for treating scrub typhus. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Antibiotics for treating scrub typhus. |
title_sort |
antibiotics for treating scrub typhus. |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-18344418954&partnerID=40&md5=5f44423fe780e9585b7e46e39b594443 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2505 |
_version_ |
1681419871418580992 |