A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer
Objective: To evaluate the postoperative morbidity and lymphocyst formation in invasive cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHPL) with no drainage and no peritonization compared with retroperitoneal drainage and peritonization. Methods: Between July 1...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2014
|
Online Access: | http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036592789&partnerID=40&md5=d616f30ed4c88cd985f0d6d0d22a6afc http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12214830 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2542 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Chiang Mai University |
Language: | English |
id |
th-cmuir.6653943832-2542 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-cmuir.6653943832-25422014-08-30T02:00:57Z A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer Srisomboon J. Phongnarisorn C. Suprasert P. Cheewakriangkrai C. Siriaree S. Charoenkwan K. Objective: To evaluate the postoperative morbidity and lymphocyst formation in invasive cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHPL) with no drainage and no peritonization compared with retroperitoneal drainage and peritonization. Methods: Between July 1999 and May 2000, 100 patients with stage IA-IIA cervical cancer undergoing RHPL in Chiang Mai University Hospital were prospectively randomized to receive either no peritonization and no drainage (Group A = 48 cases) or retroperitoneal drainage and peritonization (Group B = 52 cases). Perioperative data and morbidity were recorded. Transabdominal and transvaginal sonography were performed at 4, 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively to detect lymphocyst formation. Results: Both groups were similar regarding age, size and gross appearance of tumor, tumor histology and stage. There was no difference between groups in respect of operative time, need for blood transfusion, intraoperative complications, hospital stay, number of nodes removed, nodal metastases, and need for adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy. Asymptomatic lymphocysts were sonographically detected at 4, 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively in 3 (6.8%), 2 (4.6%), and 3 (7.7%) of 44, 43, and 39 patients, respectively in Group A, whereas none was found in Group B (P = 0.2). No significant difference was found in term of postoperative morbidity in the two groups. Conclusion: Routine retroperitoneal drainage and peritonization after RHPL for invasive cervical cancer can be safely omitted. 2014-08-30T02:00:57Z 2014-08-30T02:00:57Z 2002 Article 13418076 10.1046/j.1341-8076.2002.00027.x 12214830 JOGRF http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036592789&partnerID=40&md5=d616f30ed4c88cd985f0d6d0d22a6afc http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12214830 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2542 English |
institution |
Chiang Mai University |
building |
Chiang Mai University Library |
country |
Thailand |
collection |
CMU Intellectual Repository |
language |
English |
description |
Objective: To evaluate the postoperative morbidity and lymphocyst formation in invasive cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHPL) with no drainage and no peritonization compared with retroperitoneal drainage and peritonization. Methods: Between July 1999 and May 2000, 100 patients with stage IA-IIA cervical cancer undergoing RHPL in Chiang Mai University Hospital were prospectively randomized to receive either no peritonization and no drainage (Group A = 48 cases) or retroperitoneal drainage and peritonization (Group B = 52 cases). Perioperative data and morbidity were recorded. Transabdominal and transvaginal sonography were performed at 4, 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively to detect lymphocyst formation. Results: Both groups were similar regarding age, size and gross appearance of tumor, tumor histology and stage. There was no difference between groups in respect of operative time, need for blood transfusion, intraoperative complications, hospital stay, number of nodes removed, nodal metastases, and need for adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy. Asymptomatic lymphocysts were sonographically detected at 4, 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively in 3 (6.8%), 2 (4.6%), and 3 (7.7%) of 44, 43, and 39 patients, respectively in Group A, whereas none was found in Group B (P = 0.2). No significant difference was found in term of postoperative morbidity in the two groups. Conclusion: Routine retroperitoneal drainage and peritonization after RHPL for invasive cervical cancer can be safely omitted. |
format |
Article |
author |
Srisomboon J. Phongnarisorn C. Suprasert P. Cheewakriangkrai C. Siriaree S. Charoenkwan K. |
spellingShingle |
Srisomboon J. Phongnarisorn C. Suprasert P. Cheewakriangkrai C. Siriaree S. Charoenkwan K. A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer |
author_facet |
Srisomboon J. Phongnarisorn C. Suprasert P. Cheewakriangkrai C. Siriaree S. Charoenkwan K. |
author_sort |
Srisomboon J. |
title |
A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer |
title_short |
A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer |
title_full |
A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer |
title_fullStr |
A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer |
title_sort |
prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036592789&partnerID=40&md5=d616f30ed4c88cd985f0d6d0d22a6afc http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12214830 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2542 |
_version_ |
1681419878365396992 |