A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer

Objective: To evaluate the postoperative morbidity and lymphocyst formation in invasive cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHPL) with no drainage and no peritonization compared with retroperitoneal drainage and peritonization. Methods: Between July 1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Srisomboon J., Phongnarisorn C., Suprasert P., Cheewakriangkrai C., Siriaree S., Charoenkwan K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036592789&partnerID=40&md5=d616f30ed4c88cd985f0d6d0d22a6afc
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12214830
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2542
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-2542
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-25422014-08-30T02:00:57Z A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer Srisomboon J. Phongnarisorn C. Suprasert P. Cheewakriangkrai C. Siriaree S. Charoenkwan K. Objective: To evaluate the postoperative morbidity and lymphocyst formation in invasive cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHPL) with no drainage and no peritonization compared with retroperitoneal drainage and peritonization. Methods: Between July 1999 and May 2000, 100 patients with stage IA-IIA cervical cancer undergoing RHPL in Chiang Mai University Hospital were prospectively randomized to receive either no peritonization and no drainage (Group A = 48 cases) or retroperitoneal drainage and peritonization (Group B = 52 cases). Perioperative data and morbidity were recorded. Transabdominal and transvaginal sonography were performed at 4, 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively to detect lymphocyst formation. Results: Both groups were similar regarding age, size and gross appearance of tumor, tumor histology and stage. There was no difference between groups in respect of operative time, need for blood transfusion, intraoperative complications, hospital stay, number of nodes removed, nodal metastases, and need for adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy. Asymptomatic lymphocysts were sonographically detected at 4, 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively in 3 (6.8%), 2 (4.6%), and 3 (7.7%) of 44, 43, and 39 patients, respectively in Group A, whereas none was found in Group B (P = 0.2). No significant difference was found in term of postoperative morbidity in the two groups. Conclusion: Routine retroperitoneal drainage and peritonization after RHPL for invasive cervical cancer can be safely omitted. 2014-08-30T02:00:57Z 2014-08-30T02:00:57Z 2002 Article 13418076 10.1046/j.1341-8076.2002.00027.x 12214830 JOGRF http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036592789&partnerID=40&md5=d616f30ed4c88cd985f0d6d0d22a6afc http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12214830 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2542 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Objective: To evaluate the postoperative morbidity and lymphocyst formation in invasive cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHPL) with no drainage and no peritonization compared with retroperitoneal drainage and peritonization. Methods: Between July 1999 and May 2000, 100 patients with stage IA-IIA cervical cancer undergoing RHPL in Chiang Mai University Hospital were prospectively randomized to receive either no peritonization and no drainage (Group A = 48 cases) or retroperitoneal drainage and peritonization (Group B = 52 cases). Perioperative data and morbidity were recorded. Transabdominal and transvaginal sonography were performed at 4, 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively to detect lymphocyst formation. Results: Both groups were similar regarding age, size and gross appearance of tumor, tumor histology and stage. There was no difference between groups in respect of operative time, need for blood transfusion, intraoperative complications, hospital stay, number of nodes removed, nodal metastases, and need for adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy. Asymptomatic lymphocysts were sonographically detected at 4, 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively in 3 (6.8%), 2 (4.6%), and 3 (7.7%) of 44, 43, and 39 patients, respectively in Group A, whereas none was found in Group B (P = 0.2). No significant difference was found in term of postoperative morbidity in the two groups. Conclusion: Routine retroperitoneal drainage and peritonization after RHPL for invasive cervical cancer can be safely omitted.
format Article
author Srisomboon J.
Phongnarisorn C.
Suprasert P.
Cheewakriangkrai C.
Siriaree S.
Charoenkwan K.
spellingShingle Srisomboon J.
Phongnarisorn C.
Suprasert P.
Cheewakriangkrai C.
Siriaree S.
Charoenkwan K.
A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer
author_facet Srisomboon J.
Phongnarisorn C.
Suprasert P.
Cheewakriangkrai C.
Siriaree S.
Charoenkwan K.
author_sort Srisomboon J.
title A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer
title_short A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer
title_full A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer
title_fullStr A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer
title_sort prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036592789&partnerID=40&md5=d616f30ed4c88cd985f0d6d0d22a6afc
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12214830
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2542
_version_ 1681419878365396992