Sonographic features of trisomy 13 at midpregnancy

Objectives: To evaluate the sonographic characteristics, at 16-22 weeks of gestation, of fetuses later diagnosed with trisomy 13. Methods: This descriptive analysis of a case series was conducted from June 1989 to May 2001 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tongsong T., Sirichotiyakul S., Wanapirak C., Chanprapaph P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036154998&partnerID=40&md5=74e5c22fd8a55599e0004c964646330f
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11818108
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2596
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-2596
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-25962014-08-30T02:25:07Z Sonographic features of trisomy 13 at midpregnancy Tongsong T. Sirichotiyakul S. Wanapirak C. Chanprapaph P. Objectives: To evaluate the sonographic characteristics, at 16-22 weeks of gestation, of fetuses later diagnosed with trisomy 13. Methods: This descriptive analysis of a case series was conducted from June 1989 to May 2001 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. Women with abnormal sonographic findings at midpregnancy (16-22 weeks of gestation) underwent amniocentesis or cordocentesis for karyotyping, and the inclusion criterion was proven trisomy 13. Results: Indications for sonographic examination at midpregnancy were a genetic risk, large- or small-for-date fetus, and other suspected anomalies. Fifteen fetuses were later diagnosed with trisomy 13. In all of these cases there was at least one abnormal sonographic finding. In only one case did the fetus show no structural abnormality (at 17 weeks), but polyhydramnios and fetal growth restriction were observed. Common sonographic findings included holoprosencephaly with associated facial anomalies, and abnormal feet and/or hands, especially polydactyly. Non-structural abnormal findings such as polyhydramnios or fetal growth restriction were seen in less than one third of the fetuses. Conclusions: Nearly all the fetuses with trisomy 13 had sonographic characteristics of abnormalities at midpregnancy although common findings had often not yet appeared or the findings were low-sensitive. Detailed ultrasound at midpregnancy could effectively screen for further genetic testing pregnancies at risk for trisomy 13. © 2002 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2014-08-30T02:25:07Z 2014-08-30T02:25:07Z 2002 Article 00207292 10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00571-9 11818108 IJGOA http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036154998&partnerID=40&md5=74e5c22fd8a55599e0004c964646330f http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11818108 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2596 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Objectives: To evaluate the sonographic characteristics, at 16-22 weeks of gestation, of fetuses later diagnosed with trisomy 13. Methods: This descriptive analysis of a case series was conducted from June 1989 to May 2001 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. Women with abnormal sonographic findings at midpregnancy (16-22 weeks of gestation) underwent amniocentesis or cordocentesis for karyotyping, and the inclusion criterion was proven trisomy 13. Results: Indications for sonographic examination at midpregnancy were a genetic risk, large- or small-for-date fetus, and other suspected anomalies. Fifteen fetuses were later diagnosed with trisomy 13. In all of these cases there was at least one abnormal sonographic finding. In only one case did the fetus show no structural abnormality (at 17 weeks), but polyhydramnios and fetal growth restriction were observed. Common sonographic findings included holoprosencephaly with associated facial anomalies, and abnormal feet and/or hands, especially polydactyly. Non-structural abnormal findings such as polyhydramnios or fetal growth restriction were seen in less than one third of the fetuses. Conclusions: Nearly all the fetuses with trisomy 13 had sonographic characteristics of abnormalities at midpregnancy although common findings had often not yet appeared or the findings were low-sensitive. Detailed ultrasound at midpregnancy could effectively screen for further genetic testing pregnancies at risk for trisomy 13. © 2002 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
format Article
author Tongsong T.
Sirichotiyakul S.
Wanapirak C.
Chanprapaph P.
spellingShingle Tongsong T.
Sirichotiyakul S.
Wanapirak C.
Chanprapaph P.
Sonographic features of trisomy 13 at midpregnancy
author_facet Tongsong T.
Sirichotiyakul S.
Wanapirak C.
Chanprapaph P.
author_sort Tongsong T.
title Sonographic features of trisomy 13 at midpregnancy
title_short Sonographic features of trisomy 13 at midpregnancy
title_full Sonographic features of trisomy 13 at midpregnancy
title_fullStr Sonographic features of trisomy 13 at midpregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Sonographic features of trisomy 13 at midpregnancy
title_sort sonographic features of trisomy 13 at midpregnancy
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036154998&partnerID=40&md5=74e5c22fd8a55599e0004c964646330f
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11818108
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2596
_version_ 1681419888565944320