Do climatic and physical factors affect populations of the blow fly Chrysomya megacephala and house fly Musca domestica?

The blow fly, Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius), and house fly, Musca domestica L., are medically and forensically important flies. The population dynamic of these flies is essential for both control and forensical aspects. The aim of this study was to investigate the climatic and physical factors a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ngoen-Klan R., Moophayak K., Klong-Klaew T., Irvine K.N., Sukontason K.L., Prangkio C., Somboon P., Sukontason K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-82955167874&partnerID=40&md5=9f6b6b30ea6db532d999012984a75dcb
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21479574
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2674
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-2674
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-26742014-08-30T02:25:15Z Do climatic and physical factors affect populations of the blow fly Chrysomya megacephala and house fly Musca domestica? Ngoen-Klan R. Moophayak K. Klong-Klaew T. Irvine K.N. Sukontason K.L. Prangkio C. Somboon P. Sukontason K. The blow fly, Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius), and house fly, Musca domestica L., are medically and forensically important flies. The population dynamic of these flies is essential for both control and forensical aspects. The aim of this study was to investigate the climatic and physical factors affecting the population trend of both species in Chiang Mai province, northern Thailand, using the Geographic Information System (GIS). Based on systematic random sampling, 18 study sites were selected in three districts (Mueang Chiang Mai, Mae Rim, and Hang Dong). Six land use types were involved in the study sites, i.e., disturbed mixed deciduous, mixed deciduous forest, mixed orchard, lowland village, city, and paddy field. Adult flies were sampled every 2 weeks using an in-house prototype reconstructable funnel trap. Two types of bait were used - one with fresh beef viscera for luring M. domestica and the other with 1-day tainted beef viscera for luring C. megacephala. Collections were conducted from May 2009 to May 2010, and analysis of climatic factors (temperature, relative humidity, and light intensity) was carried out. Correlation bivariate analysis was performed initially to determine the relationship between climatic factors and the number of flies. Consequently, an ordinary co-kriging approach, in ArcGIS 9.2, was performed to predict the spatial distribution of flies with land use and climatic factors as co-variables. A total of 63,158 flies were captured, with C. megacephala being the most common species collected (68.37%), while only 1.3% were M. domestica, thus proving that C. megacephala was the most abundant species in several land use types. A significantly higher number of females than males was found in both species. Fly populations can be collected throughout most of the year with a peak in late summer, which shows a positive relation to temperature but negative correlation with relative humidity. C. megacephala was predicted to be abundant in every land use type, from lowland to forested areas, while the density of house fly was association with altitude and land use types. © Springer-Verlag 2011. 2014-08-30T02:25:15Z 2014-08-30T02:25:15Z 2011 Article 9320113 10.1007/s00436-011-2372-x PARRE http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-82955167874&partnerID=40&md5=9f6b6b30ea6db532d999012984a75dcb http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21479574 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2674 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description The blow fly, Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius), and house fly, Musca domestica L., are medically and forensically important flies. The population dynamic of these flies is essential for both control and forensical aspects. The aim of this study was to investigate the climatic and physical factors affecting the population trend of both species in Chiang Mai province, northern Thailand, using the Geographic Information System (GIS). Based on systematic random sampling, 18 study sites were selected in three districts (Mueang Chiang Mai, Mae Rim, and Hang Dong). Six land use types were involved in the study sites, i.e., disturbed mixed deciduous, mixed deciduous forest, mixed orchard, lowland village, city, and paddy field. Adult flies were sampled every 2 weeks using an in-house prototype reconstructable funnel trap. Two types of bait were used - one with fresh beef viscera for luring M. domestica and the other with 1-day tainted beef viscera for luring C. megacephala. Collections were conducted from May 2009 to May 2010, and analysis of climatic factors (temperature, relative humidity, and light intensity) was carried out. Correlation bivariate analysis was performed initially to determine the relationship between climatic factors and the number of flies. Consequently, an ordinary co-kriging approach, in ArcGIS 9.2, was performed to predict the spatial distribution of flies with land use and climatic factors as co-variables. A total of 63,158 flies were captured, with C. megacephala being the most common species collected (68.37%), while only 1.3% were M. domestica, thus proving that C. megacephala was the most abundant species in several land use types. A significantly higher number of females than males was found in both species. Fly populations can be collected throughout most of the year with a peak in late summer, which shows a positive relation to temperature but negative correlation with relative humidity. C. megacephala was predicted to be abundant in every land use type, from lowland to forested areas, while the density of house fly was association with altitude and land use types. © Springer-Verlag 2011.
format Article
author Ngoen-Klan R.
Moophayak K.
Klong-Klaew T.
Irvine K.N.
Sukontason K.L.
Prangkio C.
Somboon P.
Sukontason K.
spellingShingle Ngoen-Klan R.
Moophayak K.
Klong-Klaew T.
Irvine K.N.
Sukontason K.L.
Prangkio C.
Somboon P.
Sukontason K.
Do climatic and physical factors affect populations of the blow fly Chrysomya megacephala and house fly Musca domestica?
author_facet Ngoen-Klan R.
Moophayak K.
Klong-Klaew T.
Irvine K.N.
Sukontason K.L.
Prangkio C.
Somboon P.
Sukontason K.
author_sort Ngoen-Klan R.
title Do climatic and physical factors affect populations of the blow fly Chrysomya megacephala and house fly Musca domestica?
title_short Do climatic and physical factors affect populations of the blow fly Chrysomya megacephala and house fly Musca domestica?
title_full Do climatic and physical factors affect populations of the blow fly Chrysomya megacephala and house fly Musca domestica?
title_fullStr Do climatic and physical factors affect populations of the blow fly Chrysomya megacephala and house fly Musca domestica?
title_full_unstemmed Do climatic and physical factors affect populations of the blow fly Chrysomya megacephala and house fly Musca domestica?
title_sort do climatic and physical factors affect populations of the blow fly chrysomya megacephala and house fly musca domestica?
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-82955167874&partnerID=40&md5=9f6b6b30ea6db532d999012984a75dcb
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21479574
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2674
_version_ 1681419903391760384