Effects of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A double-blind randomized controlled trial

Background: This study aimed to investigate the effect of preemptive etoricoxib compared with placebo in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled 120 patients requiring elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The patients were randomized...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandhu T., Paiboonworachat S., Ko-Iam W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79251641940&partnerID=40&md5=eb8de06fd1be0d5bbaacb52ed32b69b6
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20589515
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2722
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-2722
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-27222014-08-30T02:25:18Z Effects of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A double-blind randomized controlled trial Sandhu T. Paiboonworachat S. Ko-Iam W. Background: This study aimed to investigate the effect of preemptive etoricoxib compared with placebo in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled 120 patients requiring elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The patients were randomized to receive either etoricoxib 120 mg plus diazepam or placebo plus diazepam. Postoperatively, the visual analog score (VAS) for pain, the rescue morphine requirement, and the side effects were recorded. Results: Between February 2006 and September 2007, 120 patients were enrolled in the study. The demographic data between two groups were similar except for mean age. The mean age of the placebo group was younger (p = 0.007). There were no significant differences in bleeding tendency rating scores, duration times between fentanyl and rescue morphine, number of rescue morphine doses, or length of postoperative hospital stay. But the number of oral analgesic drug usages was significantly less in the etoricoxib group (p = 0.006). The postoperative VAS was lower in the etoricoxib group at hours 10 (p = 0.023), 14 (p = 0.045), and 26 (p = 0.011), and the average VAS also was significantly less in the etoricoxib group (p = 0.013). The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of postoperative shoulder pain (p = 0.065). According to the verbal rating scale, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.797), nor did the drug side effects or treatment complications. Conclusion: The authors recommend using etoricoxib as a preemptive analgesia to reduce postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2014-08-30T02:25:18Z 2014-08-30T02:25:18Z 2011 Article 9302794 10.1007/s00464-010-1122-y 20589515 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79251641940&partnerID=40&md5=eb8de06fd1be0d5bbaacb52ed32b69b6 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20589515 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2722 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Background: This study aimed to investigate the effect of preemptive etoricoxib compared with placebo in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled 120 patients requiring elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The patients were randomized to receive either etoricoxib 120 mg plus diazepam or placebo plus diazepam. Postoperatively, the visual analog score (VAS) for pain, the rescue morphine requirement, and the side effects were recorded. Results: Between February 2006 and September 2007, 120 patients were enrolled in the study. The demographic data between two groups were similar except for mean age. The mean age of the placebo group was younger (p = 0.007). There were no significant differences in bleeding tendency rating scores, duration times between fentanyl and rescue morphine, number of rescue morphine doses, or length of postoperative hospital stay. But the number of oral analgesic drug usages was significantly less in the etoricoxib group (p = 0.006). The postoperative VAS was lower in the etoricoxib group at hours 10 (p = 0.023), 14 (p = 0.045), and 26 (p = 0.011), and the average VAS also was significantly less in the etoricoxib group (p = 0.013). The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of postoperative shoulder pain (p = 0.065). According to the verbal rating scale, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.797), nor did the drug side effects or treatment complications. Conclusion: The authors recommend using etoricoxib as a preemptive analgesia to reduce postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
format Article
author Sandhu T.
Paiboonworachat S.
Ko-Iam W.
spellingShingle Sandhu T.
Paiboonworachat S.
Ko-Iam W.
Effects of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A double-blind randomized controlled trial
author_facet Sandhu T.
Paiboonworachat S.
Ko-Iam W.
author_sort Sandhu T.
title Effects of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A double-blind randomized controlled trial
title_short Effects of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A double-blind randomized controlled trial
title_full Effects of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A double-blind randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Effects of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A double-blind randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A double-blind randomized controlled trial
title_sort effects of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79251641940&partnerID=40&md5=eb8de06fd1be0d5bbaacb52ed32b69b6
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20589515
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2722
_version_ 1681419912699969536