Survival and Prognostic Factors Comparing Stage IB 1 versus Stage IB 2 Cervical Cancer Treated with Primary Radical Hysterectomy

This study was undertaken to compare the survival rates of stage IB 1 versus stage IB 2 cervical cancer patients and to evaluate the prognostic factors after treatment primarily with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHPL). Patients with stage IB cervical cancer undergoing primary RHP...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Srisomboon J., Kietpeerakool C., Suprasert P., Manopanya M., Siriaree S., Charoenkwan K., Cheewakriangkrai C., Sae-Teng C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22126559
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/3072
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-3072
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-30722014-08-30T02:25:43Z Survival and Prognostic Factors Comparing Stage IB 1 versus Stage IB 2 Cervical Cancer Treated with Primary Radical Hysterectomy Srisomboon J. Kietpeerakool C. Suprasert P. Manopanya M. Siriaree S. Charoenkwan K. Cheewakriangkrai C. Sae-Teng C. This study was undertaken to compare the survival rates of stage IB 1 versus stage IB 2 cervical cancer patients and to evaluate the prognostic factors after treatment primarily with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHPL). Patients with stage IB cervical cancer undergoing primary RHPL at Chiang Mai University Hospital between January 2002 and December 2009 were evaluated for survival and recurrence. Clinicopathological variables were analyzed to identify the prognostic factors affecting the survival of the patients. During the study period, RHPL was performed on 570 stage IB 1 and 110 stage IB 2 cervical cancer patients. With a median follow-up of 48 months, the 5-year disease-free survivals were 98.1% and 82.8% respectively (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified four significant prognostic factors affecting survival including sub-staging, non-squamous cell carcinoma histology, lymph node metastasis and the presence of lymph-vascular space invasion. In conclusion, with a primary radical hysterectomy, stage IB 1 cervical cancer patients have a significantly better survival rate than those with stage IB 2. Significant prognostic factors for stage IB cervical cancer include tumor histology, nodal status, and the presence of lymph-vascular space invasion. 2014-08-30T02:25:43Z 2014-08-30T02:25:43Z 2011 Journal Article 1513-7368 22126559 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22126559 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/3072 eng
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description This study was undertaken to compare the survival rates of stage IB 1 versus stage IB 2 cervical cancer patients and to evaluate the prognostic factors after treatment primarily with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHPL). Patients with stage IB cervical cancer undergoing primary RHPL at Chiang Mai University Hospital between January 2002 and December 2009 were evaluated for survival and recurrence. Clinicopathological variables were analyzed to identify the prognostic factors affecting the survival of the patients. During the study period, RHPL was performed on 570 stage IB 1 and 110 stage IB 2 cervical cancer patients. With a median follow-up of 48 months, the 5-year disease-free survivals were 98.1% and 82.8% respectively (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified four significant prognostic factors affecting survival including sub-staging, non-squamous cell carcinoma histology, lymph node metastasis and the presence of lymph-vascular space invasion. In conclusion, with a primary radical hysterectomy, stage IB 1 cervical cancer patients have a significantly better survival rate than those with stage IB 2. Significant prognostic factors for stage IB cervical cancer include tumor histology, nodal status, and the presence of lymph-vascular space invasion.
format Article
author Srisomboon J.
Kietpeerakool C.
Suprasert P.
Manopanya M.
Siriaree S.
Charoenkwan K.
Cheewakriangkrai C.
Sae-Teng C.
spellingShingle Srisomboon J.
Kietpeerakool C.
Suprasert P.
Manopanya M.
Siriaree S.
Charoenkwan K.
Cheewakriangkrai C.
Sae-Teng C.
Survival and Prognostic Factors Comparing Stage IB 1 versus Stage IB 2 Cervical Cancer Treated with Primary Radical Hysterectomy
author_facet Srisomboon J.
Kietpeerakool C.
Suprasert P.
Manopanya M.
Siriaree S.
Charoenkwan K.
Cheewakriangkrai C.
Sae-Teng C.
author_sort Srisomboon J.
title Survival and Prognostic Factors Comparing Stage IB 1 versus Stage IB 2 Cervical Cancer Treated with Primary Radical Hysterectomy
title_short Survival and Prognostic Factors Comparing Stage IB 1 versus Stage IB 2 Cervical Cancer Treated with Primary Radical Hysterectomy
title_full Survival and Prognostic Factors Comparing Stage IB 1 versus Stage IB 2 Cervical Cancer Treated with Primary Radical Hysterectomy
title_fullStr Survival and Prognostic Factors Comparing Stage IB 1 versus Stage IB 2 Cervical Cancer Treated with Primary Radical Hysterectomy
title_full_unstemmed Survival and Prognostic Factors Comparing Stage IB 1 versus Stage IB 2 Cervical Cancer Treated with Primary Radical Hysterectomy
title_sort survival and prognostic factors comparing stage ib 1 versus stage ib 2 cervical cancer treated with primary radical hysterectomy
publishDate 2014
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22126559
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/3072
_version_ 1681419979329634304