Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Since the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was reported in 1990, it has met with widespread acceptance as a standard procedure using four trocars. The fourth (lateral) trocar is used to grasp the fundus of the gallbladder so as to expose Calot's triangle. It has been argued that the four...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Clinical Trial |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2014
|
| Online Access: | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3502482 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/3257 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Chiang Mai University |
| Language: | English |
| id |
th-cmuir.6653943832-3257 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
th-cmuir.6653943832-32572014-08-30T02:25:56Z Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy Trichak S. Since the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was reported in 1990, it has met with widespread acceptance as a standard procedure using four trocars. The fourth (lateral) trocar is used to grasp the fundus of the gallbladder so as to expose Calot's triangle. It has been argued that the fourth trocar is not necessary in most cases. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the three-port vs the four-port technique. 2014-08-30T02:25:56Z 2014-08-30T02:25:56Z 2003 Clinical Trial 1432-2218 12799892 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3502482 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/3257 eng |
| institution |
Chiang Mai University |
| building |
Chiang Mai University Library |
| country |
Thailand |
| collection |
CMU Intellectual Repository |
| language |
English |
| description |
Since the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was reported in 1990, it has met with widespread acceptance as a standard procedure using four trocars. The fourth (lateral) trocar is used to grasp the fundus of the gallbladder so as to expose Calot's triangle. It has been argued that the fourth trocar is not necessary in most cases. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the three-port vs the four-port technique. |
| format |
Clinical Trial |
| author |
Trichak S. |
| spellingShingle |
Trichak S. Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
| author_facet |
Trichak S. |
| author_sort |
Trichak S. |
| title |
Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
| title_short |
Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
| title_full |
Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
| title_fullStr |
Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
| title_sort |
three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| url |
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3502482 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/3257 |
| _version_ |
1681420014216806400 |