The retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms

Graft replacement has become the reliable and effective form of treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Operative therapy remains the major undertaking with significant rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. The use of retroperitoneal approach has been proposed as an alternative to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laohapensang K., Pongcheowboon A., Rerkasem K.
Format: Clinical Trial
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3502482
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/3430
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-3430
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-34302014-08-30T02:26:07Z The retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms Laohapensang K. Pongcheowboon A. Rerkasem K. Graft replacement has become the reliable and effective form of treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Operative therapy remains the major undertaking with significant rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. The use of retroperitoneal approach has been proposed as an alternative to standard midline transabdominal approach. Over a 5 year period, 43 consecutive nonrandomized infrarenal AAA patients underwent elective surgical correction by the authors. 32 patients with the mean age of 75 underwent transabdominal reconstructive procedures for AAA. The average size of AAA was 5.9 cm and operative time was 3 hours and 25 minutes. The mortality rate was 6.25 per cent (2 of 32). The cause of death was myocardial infarction 1, and acute renal failure 1. There are many complications in the transabdominal group. 11 had prolonged ileus, 2 MI, 2 wound dehiscence, 2 atelectasis, 1 acute renal failure and 1 chylous ascites. In 11 patients with retroperitoneal approach, the average size of AAA was 5.6 cm and operative time was 3 hours and 29 minutes. No operative mortality, the only 1 complication was retroperitoneal hematoma. The most notable difference between the retroperitoneal group and transabdominal group was the speed and ease of postoperative recovery. The patients in the retroperitoneal group needed a shorter period of intubation, nasogastric drainage, stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. Patients in the retroperitoneal group also resumed oral alimentation sooner, shorter and smoother postoperative course. The patients in the retroperitoneal group had less blood loss and fewer transfusions than in the transabdominal group. Findings from our experience using the left retroperitoneal approach for a reconstructive procedure of AAA indicate that it results in fewer overall physiologic disturbances of the patients. We believe that the left retroperitoneal approach is a useful surgical access of choice for the elective repair of AAA. 2014-08-30T02:26:07Z 2014-08-30T02:26:07Z 1997 Clinical Trial 0125-2208 9277079 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3502482 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/3430 eng
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Graft replacement has become the reliable and effective form of treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Operative therapy remains the major undertaking with significant rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. The use of retroperitoneal approach has been proposed as an alternative to standard midline transabdominal approach. Over a 5 year period, 43 consecutive nonrandomized infrarenal AAA patients underwent elective surgical correction by the authors. 32 patients with the mean age of 75 underwent transabdominal reconstructive procedures for AAA. The average size of AAA was 5.9 cm and operative time was 3 hours and 25 minutes. The mortality rate was 6.25 per cent (2 of 32). The cause of death was myocardial infarction 1, and acute renal failure 1. There are many complications in the transabdominal group. 11 had prolonged ileus, 2 MI, 2 wound dehiscence, 2 atelectasis, 1 acute renal failure and 1 chylous ascites. In 11 patients with retroperitoneal approach, the average size of AAA was 5.6 cm and operative time was 3 hours and 29 minutes. No operative mortality, the only 1 complication was retroperitoneal hematoma. The most notable difference between the retroperitoneal group and transabdominal group was the speed and ease of postoperative recovery. The patients in the retroperitoneal group needed a shorter period of intubation, nasogastric drainage, stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. Patients in the retroperitoneal group also resumed oral alimentation sooner, shorter and smoother postoperative course. The patients in the retroperitoneal group had less blood loss and fewer transfusions than in the transabdominal group. Findings from our experience using the left retroperitoneal approach for a reconstructive procedure of AAA indicate that it results in fewer overall physiologic disturbances of the patients. We believe that the left retroperitoneal approach is a useful surgical access of choice for the elective repair of AAA.
format Clinical Trial
author Laohapensang K.
Pongcheowboon A.
Rerkasem K.
spellingShingle Laohapensang K.
Pongcheowboon A.
Rerkasem K.
The retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms
author_facet Laohapensang K.
Pongcheowboon A.
Rerkasem K.
author_sort Laohapensang K.
title The retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms
title_short The retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms
title_full The retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms
title_fullStr The retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms
title_full_unstemmed The retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms
title_sort retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms
publishDate 2014
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3502482
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/3430
_version_ 1681420046630387712