An indirect comparison of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pemetrexed treatment for patients with advanced first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in East Asia

Aims: To compare the relative efficacy of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy (BevCG) with cisplatin plus pemetrexed (CP) in the first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in East Asian patients. In the absence of evidence from head-to-head trial...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chang J.W.-C., Thongprasert S., Wright E., Tsang K., Kim H.T., Ahn M.-J., Kim J.-H., Kang J.H., Kim S.-W., Walzer S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79956069755&partnerID=40&md5=b8de67fedc80859ff01b76479f1b4973
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/3749
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-3749
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-37492014-08-30T02:35:16Z An indirect comparison of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pemetrexed treatment for patients with advanced first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in East Asia Chang J.W.-C. Thongprasert S. Wright E. Tsang K. Kim H.T. Ahn M.-J. Kim J.-H. Kang J.H. Kim S.-W. Walzer S. Aims: To compare the relative efficacy of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy (BevCG) with cisplatin plus pemetrexed (CP) in the first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in East Asian patients. In the absence of evidence from head-to-head trials, an adjusted indirect treatment comparison (ITC) approach was selected to compare these treatments. Methods: BevCG and CP treatments have been compared in their relative effects versus their common comparator, the CG treatment. Outcomes from the ITC were used in a statistical model to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the two treatments. The non-proportional hazards log-logistic, accelerated failure time model was selected as it provided the best fit. The ITC hazard ratio (HR) was conservatively adjusted to match what was observed between the cumulative hazard functions until the end of the Avastin in Lung trial follow-up period. Results: The ITC analysis suggests that patients treated with Bev-based treatment can expect more favorable outcomes in terms of both PFS and OS (PFS HR=0.71 and OS HR=0.41). Probabilistic sensitivity analyses of PFS and OS HR showed that HR values below 1 are likely to occur in 82% of patients for PFS HR and in 94% of patients for OS HR. Conclusion: BevCG can be considered a more effective therapy than CP for NSCLC patients in East Asia. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd. 2014-08-30T02:35:16Z 2014-08-30T02:35:16Z 2011 Article 17437555 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2011.01398.x 21585704 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79956069755&partnerID=40&md5=b8de67fedc80859ff01b76479f1b4973 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/3749 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Aims: To compare the relative efficacy of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy (BevCG) with cisplatin plus pemetrexed (CP) in the first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in East Asian patients. In the absence of evidence from head-to-head trials, an adjusted indirect treatment comparison (ITC) approach was selected to compare these treatments. Methods: BevCG and CP treatments have been compared in their relative effects versus their common comparator, the CG treatment. Outcomes from the ITC were used in a statistical model to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the two treatments. The non-proportional hazards log-logistic, accelerated failure time model was selected as it provided the best fit. The ITC hazard ratio (HR) was conservatively adjusted to match what was observed between the cumulative hazard functions until the end of the Avastin in Lung trial follow-up period. Results: The ITC analysis suggests that patients treated with Bev-based treatment can expect more favorable outcomes in terms of both PFS and OS (PFS HR=0.71 and OS HR=0.41). Probabilistic sensitivity analyses of PFS and OS HR showed that HR values below 1 are likely to occur in 82% of patients for PFS HR and in 94% of patients for OS HR. Conclusion: BevCG can be considered a more effective therapy than CP for NSCLC patients in East Asia. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
format Article
author Chang J.W.-C.
Thongprasert S.
Wright E.
Tsang K.
Kim H.T.
Ahn M.-J.
Kim J.-H.
Kang J.H.
Kim S.-W.
Walzer S.
spellingShingle Chang J.W.-C.
Thongprasert S.
Wright E.
Tsang K.
Kim H.T.
Ahn M.-J.
Kim J.-H.
Kang J.H.
Kim S.-W.
Walzer S.
An indirect comparison of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pemetrexed treatment for patients with advanced first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in East Asia
author_facet Chang J.W.-C.
Thongprasert S.
Wright E.
Tsang K.
Kim H.T.
Ahn M.-J.
Kim J.-H.
Kang J.H.
Kim S.-W.
Walzer S.
author_sort Chang J.W.-C.
title An indirect comparison of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pemetrexed treatment for patients with advanced first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in East Asia
title_short An indirect comparison of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pemetrexed treatment for patients with advanced first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in East Asia
title_full An indirect comparison of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pemetrexed treatment for patients with advanced first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in East Asia
title_fullStr An indirect comparison of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pemetrexed treatment for patients with advanced first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in East Asia
title_full_unstemmed An indirect comparison of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pemetrexed treatment for patients with advanced first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in East Asia
title_sort indirect comparison of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pemetrexed treatment for patients with advanced first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in east asia
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79956069755&partnerID=40&md5=b8de67fedc80859ff01b76479f1b4973
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/3749
_version_ 1681420107295752192