Methamphetamine dependence treatment rehabilitation in Thailand: A model assessment

Objective: Assess the process and outcome of the treatment rehabilitation program in Thailand by comparing out-patients and in-patients from drug dependent treatment centers (DDTCs) under Matrix and FAST Models. Material and Method: In the DDTCs, male in-patient and out-patient olunteers aged 15-35...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Perngparn U., Limanonda B., Aramrattana A., Pilley C., Areesantichai C., Taneepanichskul S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79251572923&partnerID=40&md5=e8abe766a9a489fb22a016b0512c8ca3
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/3793
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-3793
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-37932014-08-30T02:35:19Z Methamphetamine dependence treatment rehabilitation in Thailand: A model assessment Perngparn U. Limanonda B. Aramrattana A. Pilley C. Areesantichai C. Taneepanichskul S. Objective: Assess the process and outcome of the treatment rehabilitation program in Thailand by comparing out-patients and in-patients from drug dependent treatment centers (DDTCs) under Matrix and FAST Models. Material and Method: In the DDTCs, male in-patient and out-patient olunteers aged 15-35 years were randomly selected to assess demographic characteristics, socio-economic status, history of substance use, and other behavior related to their health. Observations of the process of therapy and assessment of patients' improvement were made. After completing the rehabilitation, which lasted four months, trained field workers visited the patients at 1-, 3- and 6-month intervals. Analyses of rehabilitation focused on cognitive and behavioral changes at one and three months. Regarding the follow-up outcomes, comparison of Matrix and FAST Models relapse was analyzed by survival graph and Cox-regression of the days since stopping illegal substance use. Results: Ninety-two in-patients and forty-three out-patients were recruited. No significant difference was found in the characteristics of the patients between the two models or in the treatment centers. After assessing patients at 1-, 3-, and 6-month, more improvement was noted among those in the FAST model than in the Matrix model. Conclusion: This research confirmed improvement in attendees at the in-patient treatment model and the effectiveness of rehabilitation. 2014-08-30T02:35:19Z 2014-08-30T02:35:19Z 2011 Article 1252208 21425736 JMTHB http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79251572923&partnerID=40&md5=e8abe766a9a489fb22a016b0512c8ca3 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/3793 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Objective: Assess the process and outcome of the treatment rehabilitation program in Thailand by comparing out-patients and in-patients from drug dependent treatment centers (DDTCs) under Matrix and FAST Models. Material and Method: In the DDTCs, male in-patient and out-patient olunteers aged 15-35 years were randomly selected to assess demographic characteristics, socio-economic status, history of substance use, and other behavior related to their health. Observations of the process of therapy and assessment of patients' improvement were made. After completing the rehabilitation, which lasted four months, trained field workers visited the patients at 1-, 3- and 6-month intervals. Analyses of rehabilitation focused on cognitive and behavioral changes at one and three months. Regarding the follow-up outcomes, comparison of Matrix and FAST Models relapse was analyzed by survival graph and Cox-regression of the days since stopping illegal substance use. Results: Ninety-two in-patients and forty-three out-patients were recruited. No significant difference was found in the characteristics of the patients between the two models or in the treatment centers. After assessing patients at 1-, 3-, and 6-month, more improvement was noted among those in the FAST model than in the Matrix model. Conclusion: This research confirmed improvement in attendees at the in-patient treatment model and the effectiveness of rehabilitation.
format Article
author Perngparn U.
Limanonda B.
Aramrattana A.
Pilley C.
Areesantichai C.
Taneepanichskul S.
spellingShingle Perngparn U.
Limanonda B.
Aramrattana A.
Pilley C.
Areesantichai C.
Taneepanichskul S.
Methamphetamine dependence treatment rehabilitation in Thailand: A model assessment
author_facet Perngparn U.
Limanonda B.
Aramrattana A.
Pilley C.
Areesantichai C.
Taneepanichskul S.
author_sort Perngparn U.
title Methamphetamine dependence treatment rehabilitation in Thailand: A model assessment
title_short Methamphetamine dependence treatment rehabilitation in Thailand: A model assessment
title_full Methamphetamine dependence treatment rehabilitation in Thailand: A model assessment
title_fullStr Methamphetamine dependence treatment rehabilitation in Thailand: A model assessment
title_full_unstemmed Methamphetamine dependence treatment rehabilitation in Thailand: A model assessment
title_sort methamphetamine dependence treatment rehabilitation in thailand: a model assessment
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79251572923&partnerID=40&md5=e8abe766a9a489fb22a016b0512c8ca3
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/3793
_version_ 1681420115605716992