Living in an urban environment and non-communicable disease risk in Thailand: Does timing matter?

© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. Background: This paper uses a life-course approach to explore whether the timing and/or duration of urban (vs rural) exposure was associated with risk factors for NCDs. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among health care workers in two hospitals in Thailand. Two me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angkurawaranon,C., Lerssrimonkol,C., Jakkaew,N., Philalai,T., Doyle,P., Nitsch,D.D.M.
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier Limited 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84924072083&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/38409
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-38409
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-384092015-06-16T07:47:10Z Living in an urban environment and non-communicable disease risk in Thailand: Does timing matter? Angkurawaranon,C. Lerssrimonkol,C. Jakkaew,N. Philalai,T. Doyle,P. Nitsch,D.D.M. Geography, Planning and Development Health (social science) Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. Background: This paper uses a life-course approach to explore whether the timing and/or duration of urban (vs rural) exposure was associated with risk factors for NCDs. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among health care workers in two hospitals in Thailand. Two measures of urbanicity were considered: early-life urban exposure and the proportion of urban life years. We explored four behavioral NCD risk factors, two physiological risk factors and four biological risk factors. Results: Both measures of urbanicity were each independently associated with increases in all behavioral and physiological risk factors. For some biological risk factors, people spending their early life in an urban area may be more susceptible to the effect of increasing proportion of urban life years than those growing up in rural areas. Conclusion: Urbanicity was associated with increases in behavioral and physiological risk factors. However, these associations may not translate directly into increases in biological risk factors. It is likely that these biological risk factors were results of a complex interaction between both long term accumulation of exposure and early life exposures. 2015-06-16T07:47:10Z 2015-06-16T07:47:10Z 2015-05-01 Article 13538292 2-s2.0-84924072083 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.02.005 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84924072083&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/38409 Elsevier Limited
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Geography, Planning and Development
Health (social science)
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
spellingShingle Geography, Planning and Development
Health (social science)
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Angkurawaranon,C.
Lerssrimonkol,C.
Jakkaew,N.
Philalai,T.
Doyle,P.
Nitsch,D.D.M.
Living in an urban environment and non-communicable disease risk in Thailand: Does timing matter?
description © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. Background: This paper uses a life-course approach to explore whether the timing and/or duration of urban (vs rural) exposure was associated with risk factors for NCDs. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among health care workers in two hospitals in Thailand. Two measures of urbanicity were considered: early-life urban exposure and the proportion of urban life years. We explored four behavioral NCD risk factors, two physiological risk factors and four biological risk factors. Results: Both measures of urbanicity were each independently associated with increases in all behavioral and physiological risk factors. For some biological risk factors, people spending their early life in an urban area may be more susceptible to the effect of increasing proportion of urban life years than those growing up in rural areas. Conclusion: Urbanicity was associated with increases in behavioral and physiological risk factors. However, these associations may not translate directly into increases in biological risk factors. It is likely that these biological risk factors were results of a complex interaction between both long term accumulation of exposure and early life exposures.
format Article
author Angkurawaranon,C.
Lerssrimonkol,C.
Jakkaew,N.
Philalai,T.
Doyle,P.
Nitsch,D.D.M.
author_facet Angkurawaranon,C.
Lerssrimonkol,C.
Jakkaew,N.
Philalai,T.
Doyle,P.
Nitsch,D.D.M.
author_sort Angkurawaranon,C.
title Living in an urban environment and non-communicable disease risk in Thailand: Does timing matter?
title_short Living in an urban environment and non-communicable disease risk in Thailand: Does timing matter?
title_full Living in an urban environment and non-communicable disease risk in Thailand: Does timing matter?
title_fullStr Living in an urban environment and non-communicable disease risk in Thailand: Does timing matter?
title_full_unstemmed Living in an urban environment and non-communicable disease risk in Thailand: Does timing matter?
title_sort living in an urban environment and non-communicable disease risk in thailand: does timing matter?
publisher Elsevier Limited
publishDate 2015
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84924072083&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/38409
_version_ 1681421468395634688