Antimicrobial activity of chitosan and carboxymethyl chitosan from diferent types and sources of chitosan

The aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial activity of chitosans and carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCH) from two molecular sizes (polymer and oligomer) and three sources (shrimp, crab and squid). The CMCH were synthesized via carboxymethylation method with monochloroacetic acid in isopropyl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tantala,J., Thongngam,M., Rachtanapun,P., Rachtanapun,C.
Format: Article
Published: Chiriotti Editori 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84896510832&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/39214
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
id th-cmuir.6653943832-39214
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-392142015-06-16T08:17:51Z Antimicrobial activity of chitosan and carboxymethyl chitosan from diferent types and sources of chitosan Tantala,J. Thongngam,M. Rachtanapun,P. Rachtanapun,C. Food Science The aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial activity of chitosans and carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCH) from two molecular sizes (polymer and oligomer) and three sources (shrimp, crab and squid). The CMCH were synthesized via carboxymethylation method with monochloroacetic acid in isopropyl alcohol under alkaline condition. The antibacterial activity of chitosan and CMCH were examined against sixteen of food borne pathogenic bacteria and two strains of lactic acid bacteria (LAB). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of chitosans and CMCH were examined by agar dilution method and the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) values were determined by broth dilution method. The results showed that all types of chitosans were generally more effective antibacterial than CMCH. The MIC of chitosans ranged from 0.008-0.15% and MBC ranged from 0.01-0.18%. LAB was the most sensitive strain to the chitosan groups (MIC = 0.008%, MBC = 0.01%). In contrast, all CMCH groups had no effect against foodborne pathogenic bacteria (MIC and MBC were higher than 1%) except for LAB which was inhibited by oligomeric CMCH, in which those of the MIC and MBC values were less than chitosan oligomer at 45-56.25 times and 25 times, respectively (MIC and MBC of chitosan crab oligomer = 0.008-0.01% and 0.02%, respectively). These observations suggested that the antibacterial activity of chitosan and CMCH depends on the chitosan sources, molecular size and the target microorganism. Therefore, application of chitosan and CMCH must be chosen selectively in order to control the target foodborne pathogens. 2015-06-16T08:17:51Z 2015-06-16T08:17:51Z 2012-01-01 Article 11201770 2-s2.0-84896510832 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84896510832&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/39214 Chiriotti Editori
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
topic Food Science
spellingShingle Food Science
Tantala,J.
Thongngam,M.
Rachtanapun,P.
Rachtanapun,C.
Antimicrobial activity of chitosan and carboxymethyl chitosan from diferent types and sources of chitosan
description The aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial activity of chitosans and carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCH) from two molecular sizes (polymer and oligomer) and three sources (shrimp, crab and squid). The CMCH were synthesized via carboxymethylation method with monochloroacetic acid in isopropyl alcohol under alkaline condition. The antibacterial activity of chitosan and CMCH were examined against sixteen of food borne pathogenic bacteria and two strains of lactic acid bacteria (LAB). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of chitosans and CMCH were examined by agar dilution method and the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) values were determined by broth dilution method. The results showed that all types of chitosans were generally more effective antibacterial than CMCH. The MIC of chitosans ranged from 0.008-0.15% and MBC ranged from 0.01-0.18%. LAB was the most sensitive strain to the chitosan groups (MIC = 0.008%, MBC = 0.01%). In contrast, all CMCH groups had no effect against foodborne pathogenic bacteria (MIC and MBC were higher than 1%) except for LAB which was inhibited by oligomeric CMCH, in which those of the MIC and MBC values were less than chitosan oligomer at 45-56.25 times and 25 times, respectively (MIC and MBC of chitosan crab oligomer = 0.008-0.01% and 0.02%, respectively). These observations suggested that the antibacterial activity of chitosan and CMCH depends on the chitosan sources, molecular size and the target microorganism. Therefore, application of chitosan and CMCH must be chosen selectively in order to control the target foodborne pathogens.
format Article
author Tantala,J.
Thongngam,M.
Rachtanapun,P.
Rachtanapun,C.
author_facet Tantala,J.
Thongngam,M.
Rachtanapun,P.
Rachtanapun,C.
author_sort Tantala,J.
title Antimicrobial activity of chitosan and carboxymethyl chitosan from diferent types and sources of chitosan
title_short Antimicrobial activity of chitosan and carboxymethyl chitosan from diferent types and sources of chitosan
title_full Antimicrobial activity of chitosan and carboxymethyl chitosan from diferent types and sources of chitosan
title_fullStr Antimicrobial activity of chitosan and carboxymethyl chitosan from diferent types and sources of chitosan
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial activity of chitosan and carboxymethyl chitosan from diferent types and sources of chitosan
title_sort antimicrobial activity of chitosan and carboxymethyl chitosan from diferent types and sources of chitosan
publisher Chiriotti Editori
publishDate 2015
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84896510832&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/39214
_version_ 1681421614043889664