A revised thai Multi-dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support

In order to ensure the construct validity of the three-factor model of the Multi-dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), and based on the assumption that it helps users differentiate between sources of social support, in this study a revised version was created and tested. The aim was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wongpakaran N., Wongpakaran T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23156952
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/3991
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-3991
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-39912014-08-30T02:35:33Z A revised thai Multi-dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support Wongpakaran N. Wongpakaran T. In order to ensure the construct validity of the three-factor model of the Multi-dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), and based on the assumption that it helps users differentiate between sources of social support, in this study a revised version was created and tested. The aim was to compare the level of model fit of the original version of the MSPSS against the revised version--which contains a minor change from the original. The study was conducted on 486 medical students who completed the original and revised versions of the MSPSS, as well as the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965) and Beck Depression Inventory II (Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996). Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to compare the results, showing that the revised version of MSPSS demonstrated a good internal consistency--with a Cronbach's alpha of .92 for the MSPSS questionnaire, and a significant correlation with the other scales, as predicted. The revised version provided better internal consistency, increasing the Cronbach's alpha for the Significant Others sub-scale from 0.86 to 0.92. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed an acceptable model fit: chi2 128.11, df 51, p < .001; TLI 0.94; CFI 0.95; GFI 0.90; PNFI 0.71; AGFI 0.85; RMSEA 0.093 (0.073-0.113) and SRMR 0.042, which is better than the original version. The tendency of the new version was to display a better level of fit with a larger sample size. The limitations of the study are discussed, as well as recommendations for further study. 2014-08-30T02:35:33Z 2014-08-30T02:35:33Z 2012 Journal Article 1138-7416 23156952 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23156952 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/3991 eng
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description In order to ensure the construct validity of the three-factor model of the Multi-dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), and based on the assumption that it helps users differentiate between sources of social support, in this study a revised version was created and tested. The aim was to compare the level of model fit of the original version of the MSPSS against the revised version--which contains a minor change from the original. The study was conducted on 486 medical students who completed the original and revised versions of the MSPSS, as well as the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965) and Beck Depression Inventory II (Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996). Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to compare the results, showing that the revised version of MSPSS demonstrated a good internal consistency--with a Cronbach's alpha of .92 for the MSPSS questionnaire, and a significant correlation with the other scales, as predicted. The revised version provided better internal consistency, increasing the Cronbach's alpha for the Significant Others sub-scale from 0.86 to 0.92. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed an acceptable model fit: chi2 128.11, df 51, p < .001; TLI 0.94; CFI 0.95; GFI 0.90; PNFI 0.71; AGFI 0.85; RMSEA 0.093 (0.073-0.113) and SRMR 0.042, which is better than the original version. The tendency of the new version was to display a better level of fit with a larger sample size. The limitations of the study are discussed, as well as recommendations for further study.
format Article
author Wongpakaran N.
Wongpakaran T.
spellingShingle Wongpakaran N.
Wongpakaran T.
A revised thai Multi-dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
author_facet Wongpakaran N.
Wongpakaran T.
author_sort Wongpakaran N.
title A revised thai Multi-dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
title_short A revised thai Multi-dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
title_full A revised thai Multi-dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
title_fullStr A revised thai Multi-dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
title_full_unstemmed A revised thai Multi-dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
title_sort revised thai multi-dimensional scale of perceived social support
publishDate 2014
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23156952
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/3991
_version_ 1681420153089163264