ประสิทธิภาพการบริหารงานของคณะผู้บริหารองค์การบริหาร ส่วนตำบลในเขตจังหวัดแม่ฮ่องสอน
This research was Administrative Efficiency of Administrative Committees in Mae Hong Son Subdistrict Administrative Organizations. The objectives of this study were 1) to study the administrative efficiency of administrative committees of Subdistrict Administrative Organizations in Mae Hong Son Pr...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Independent Study |
Language: | Thai |
Published: |
เชียงใหม่ : บัณฑิตวิทยาลัย มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/39984 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Chiang Mai University |
Language: | Thai |
Summary: | This research was Administrative Efficiency of Administrative Committees in Mae Hong Son Subdistrict Administrative Organizations. The objectives of this study were 1) to study the administrative efficiency of administrative committees of Subdistrict Administrative Organizations in Mae Hong Son Province 2) to study the level of knowledge and understanding about the administration of Administrative Committees of Subdistrict Administrative Organizations in Mae Hong Son Province 3) to study the management of various mission of Administrative Committees of Subdistrict Administrative Organizations in Mae Hong Son Province 4) to study the educational background and the duration of holding position that affect the administrative efficiency of Administrative Committees of Subdistrict Administrative Organizations in Mae Hong Son Province.
The samples of this study were 126 administrative committees of Subdistrict Administrative Organizations (SAO) in Mae Hong Son Province that consisted of 1 Chief Executive and 2 Deputies Chief Executive of each Subdistrict Administrative Organization (SAO). 114 questionnaires were returned by the respondents (90.47%). A research instrument was a questionnaire which was divided into 3 parts; 1) general information of respondents 2) knowledge and understanding about various management processes of Administrative Committees in Subdistrict Administrative Organization (SAO) 3) the result of Assessment of Standards Performance Inspection By A Local Administrative Organization in B.E. 2556. Data were analyzed by using the computer program. Statistical analyses used in research were Frequency, Percentage, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, and One-way ANOVA.
This study found that most respondents were Chief Executive of the SAO (19.30 %), First Deputy Chief Executive of the SAO (43.00 %), and Second Deputy Chief Executive of the SAO (37.70 %). The educational backgrounds of respondents were bachelor degree (46.50 %), diploma or equivalent (39.50 %), postgraduate (8.80 %), and high school diploma or equivalent (5.30 %), respectively. None of the respondent with less than high school diploma or equivalent.
The duration of holding position were 2-3 years (30.70 %), 3-4 years (24.60 %), 1-2 years (24.60 %), less than 1 year (13.20 %), and more than 4 years (7.00 %), respectively. Sizes of Subdistrict Administrative Organizaion (SAO) were moderate organization (86.80 %), small organization (13.20 %), and large organization (0.00 %), respectively.
Part of knowledge and understanding about the administration of Administrative Committees of Subdistrict Administrative Organizations (SAO) in Mae Hong Son Province found that respondents had 28 points in overview by most Administrative Committees had knowledge and understanding of administration at a fair level. When considering the main correct answers found that they had knowledge and understanding about budget management at a high level (89.80 %) and human resource management at a low level (24.60 %).
Part of administrative efficiency of Subdistrict Administrative Organizations (SAO) in Mae Hong Son Province was in a high level (77.45 %) in overview. When considering in each aspect found that the administrative efficiency that had the most success at a high level was management (81.87 %), financial and fiscal management (79.18 %), and public service (76.45 %), respectively. Furthermore, the administrative efficiency that performed at a fair level was personnel management and council affairs (72.28 %).
The analysis of relation between knowledge and understanding of management and administrative efficiency by using Pearson Correlation Coefficient found that there were no relations between those two aspects.
The comparativeness between administrative efficiency of Administrative Committees of Subdistrict Administrative Organizations (SAO) in various parts and the educational background found that Administrative Committees with the different levels of education had no difference of administrative efficiency. But the duration of holding position found that administrative efficiency of Administrative Committees of Subdistrict Administrative Organizations (SAO) with different period of holding position had the difference of administrative efficiency. |
---|